Repairing Toyota's tarnished image [Archive] - GrandAmGT.com Forum

PDA

View Full Version : Repairing Toyota's tarnished image


Vintalage
08-10-2006, 08:53 AM
August 5, 2006
Repairing Some Dents in an Image
By MICHELINE MAYNARD and MARTIN FACKLER

The news is something no car owner wants to hear. Power steering on their hard-to-get hybrid could fail. Tires on their small pickups could bulge and possibly burst. Air bags may not inflate during a crash.

These recalls are the type that have long bedeviled American carmakers, but this time it was Toyota of Japan, long known as the crème de la crème in quality.

Just as Toyota appears poised to pass General Motors to become the world’s largest automaker, it has a growing problem with recalls that is sullying its carefully honed image.

In the United States, Toyota’s largest market, the number of vehicles recalled soared to 2.2 million last year. That was double the number of vehicles recalled in 2004, and more than 10 times the 200,000 cars it recalled in 2003, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

In Japan, the number of recalled vehicles has jumped 41-fold since 2001, to 1.9 million last year. And because many of the recalls are for vehicles that are more than 10 years old, analysts fear that another wave of bad quality news may be in store.

The situation has alarmed Toyota’s top executives and angered the Japanese government. It ordered Toyota to explain itself, which the company did in a report delivered Thursday, accompanied by the latest in a series of apologies. In it, the company promised to create a new computer database to obtain information more quickly from dealers on repairs and complaints. The police in Japan said three Toyota officials were under criminal investigation on suspicion that they concealed vehicle defects over eight years.

Inside Toyota, the spate of recalls and the criminal investigation has caused a flurry of high-level efforts to diagnose and fix the problems, which have affected its Prius hybrid, the gold standard among fuel-efficient vehicles; the Tacoma pickup; and cars in its Lexus luxury lineup.

Quality problems can befall any company, whether based in Detroit, Europe or elsewhere. This week, in fact, Ford expanded a recall of its vans, sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks because of problems with cruise control systems that were prone to catching fire.

For now, Toyota’s quality issues do not seem to be damping its operations either in Japan, where it is the biggest automaker, or the United States, where Toyota passed Ford in July to rank as the No. 2 company in terms of auto sales. Nor is it affecting Toyota’s net income, which climbed 39.2 percent during the second-quarter, to $3.2 billion, the company said yesterday. [Page C4.]

But executives know they cannot let the situation fester, because it ultimately threatens Toyota’s ability to grow. If they fail to get their arms around the problem, they will have to pull back on the company’s expansion plans, which are set to include more assembly and engine plants for the United States, as well as factories elsewhere.

At Toyota’s annual executive meeting in June, its departing chairman, Hiroshi Okuda; the new chairman, Fujio Cho; and its chief executive, Katsuaki Watanabe, all vowed to managers that the quality issue would be addressed, according to a senior Toyota executive who attended the meeting.

“The quality issue is a big concern. They’re embarrassed about it,” said the executive, who insisted on anonymity because the meeting was private.

“You think about Toyota, and quality is in our DNA,” he continued. “We are concerned about looking like the rest of the pack. The market is forgiving because of our long reputation, but how long will they be forgiving?”

Interviews with car owners and dealers show they have some latitude.

Bruce Wachtell, 71, bought a 2006 Prius in March after years of driving a Toyota Tacoma pickup without any problems.

“It’s never seen a dealer,” he said of the truck.

Mr. Wachtell, a retired ship’s radio officer living in Stinson Beach, Calif., began buying foreign cars after growing frustrated with the quality of American-made vehicles. That sentiment is confirmed, he said, whenever he peruses repair records for various brands in Consumer Reports, and he has not lost any confidence in Toyota because of the recent recalls.

“I think recalls are just simply a function of the fact that no design is perfect,” he said.

Mr. Wachtell called his dealership after discovering recall notices that included the 2006 Prius on the Internet, but he was told his vehicle was not among those affected. Both the Tacoma and the Prius, however, are among the vehicles in Toyota’s recent recalls.

At Bredemann Toyota in Park Ridge, Ill., Don Ziemke, the general sales manager, said only a few shoppers had asked about the implications of the recalls. Other dealers said they had prepared their employees to answer such questions, but that no one had even brought up the topic.

“Toyota’s longevity and reliability has always been a strong suit,” Mr. Ziemke said. “That kind of takes a hit when there are recalls out there.”

Still, he said, “It’s against the grain as far as what Toyota has provided its dealer body and customers in the past.”

The primary reason for the recalls is Toyota’s overloaded engineering staff, say company executives and industry analysts.

Despite its global expansion during the 1990’s, it failed to hire enough engineers to keep up with production increases.

And it kept most of its development in Japan, even though it built research and development centers in places like Ann Arbor, Mich., and Brussels. At the same time, a new Japanese law required companies to pay for overtime for white-collar workers, raising the costs incurred by engineers, whose long hours on the job were the stuff of industry legend.

Analysts say that all this may have contributed to a number of errors introduced during vehicle development. There have been fewer problems on the assembly line, however, which has been a more common cause of recent recalls at other carmakers like Nissan.

Another issue is that Toyota, like other global auto companies, has farmed out the development of key components to its suppliers, both companies with which it has been doing business for years, like Denso of Japan, and newer ones, like the Delphi Corporation, the biggest American parts maker.


Ny Times

Vintalage
08-10-2006, 08:55 AM
The damage has been slow to emerge — indeed, most recent recalls involve cars produced in the 1990’s. But that means potential problems from hectic growth years in the early 2000’s have yet to appear, and analysts warn that Toyota’s quality woes may only become worse before they get better.

“I’m more concerned about the future,” said Kunihiko Shiohara, an auto analyst for Goldman Sachs in Tokyo. “A fundamental turnaround in quality levels will take at least four years.”

It also does not help that some rivals appear to be gaining quality ground on Toyota, whose Toyota-brand cars and Lexus line of luxury cars had long topped quality rankings. It still dominated the recommended list from Consumer Reports this year. But in June, a survey of new-vehicle quality by J. D. Power & Associates, a marketing research company, ranked the German luxury carmaker Porsche in the top spot, and with Hyundai of South Korea in second place, ahead of Toyota at No. 3.

To be sure, rising recall numbers are not limited to Toyota. A reason that recalls have gone up is that automakers are using an increasing number of common parts across a number of car models, which saves money, but also means that flaws affect larger numbers of vehicles.

Another is the increasing complexity of vehicles, as companies rely more heavily on electronics and computerized features that used to be mechanical. “It’s not fair to single out Toyota for many problems,” said Takaki Nakanishi, an auto industry analyst with J. P. Morgan in Tokyo.

Still, the rapid rise in recalls at Toyota stands out in comparison with other carmakers. In Japan, where Toyota is the largest auto company, with about 39 percent of the market, its recalls quadrupled over the last four years, to 1.9 million in 2005. That compares with 199,000 at No. 2 Nissan and 205,000 at Honda in 2005, according to the transportation ministry.

In Toyota’s case, 68 percent of its recent recalls can be blamed on design flaws, according to Goldman Sachs. They include rubber parts not made thick enough to withstand engine heat and joints too weak to hold together. Of Toyota’s recalls in 2004, 68 percent were because of design problems, Goldman Sachs said.

Analysts say Toyota’s problems stem from the mid-1990’s, when Mr. Okuda, who was president, began expanding its global production. Toyota did not hire enough engineers to keep up with production increases because it was trying to meet tough self-imposed cost-cutting targets, analysts said.

Understaffed design centers have also forced Toyota to rely on large parts makers to help design major components “Toyota’s resources have been stretched quite a bit by the big increases in volume,” said Andrew Phillips, an analyst at Nikko Citigroup in Tokyo. “What’s remarkable is that most the recalls now predate the really big ramp-up.”

That came after 2000, when Toyota’s annual vehicle sales rose to the almost 8.85 million expected this year, from about 6 million.

But Toyota has increased the hiring of new engineers, bringing on 979 last year, compared with 310 in 2001. A company spokesman, Paul Nolasco, said Toyota planned to hire at least another 850 this year.

In a departure from corporate tradition that stressed spending a career at a single company, Toyota wants 200 of its new hires to be experienced engineers hired in midcareer from elsewhere.

In June, Toyota assigned a second executive vice president to its quality control division and created a new senior managing director spot dedicated to improving quality.

“Everyone is taking this very seriously,” said a top-ranking executive in Toyota’s North American operations who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation. The stakes are high, he added: “If we can’t lick it, we will have to slow down” — a decision Toyota hopes it does not have to make.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/05/business/worldbusiness/05recall.html?ex=1155441600&en=c1effeaeb5e2a887&ei=5070

- Nick Bunkley contributed reporting for this article

- The New York Times

caraudiodave
08-10-2006, 09:24 PM
ive been saying it for a couple of years now, toyota is riding stricktly on their reputation. they make junk, and even the owners that repeatedly take in their cars for repair swear by them, stating that every maker has lemons.

Vintalage
08-12-2006, 09:42 PM
Now I have a better idea where the problems reside. A focus on global expansion with less regard to more engineers has forced the company to outsource their work and rely on contracting companies to create quality parts that may not be up to standard. Not only that, but the engineers Toyota did have were stretched thin and as a result, the products suffered in quality.

These recalls need to happen in order for Toyota to realize that their past business practices were not good (mid 90s) and their current business methods may be shaky as well. Drastic changes need to be made. If global expansion is what they want, then global expansion within the company needs to occur as well to handle the new work load.

Based on what I've read, those things are happening now. Management must get a tighter grip of the ship's wheel and maintain course otherwise they may end up in a similar situation like certain other big auto manufacturers. I like the fact that the company is willing to scale back or slow down if things erode further. That decision is better for their buyers.

Vintalage
08-12-2006, 09:49 PM
ive been saying it for a couple of years now, toyota is riding stricktly on their reputation. they make junk, and even the owners that repeatedly take in their cars for repair swear by them, stating that every maker has lemons.

Your post is nonsense. Toyota's reputation was not magically created. Toyota has built solid, reliable vehicles for years and the public noticed. The domestics weren't labeled lemons or crap because people hated them. They were labeled lemons/crap because the majority of their products were and many people were burned as a result of their purchase.

Toyota's current hiccup is due to rapid growth, poor decisions and outsourcing.

crazypontiac03
08-12-2006, 11:30 PM
Another reason is, Trying to rush vehicle's to production. Lately, it seem with there "ALL New" Model's there rushing them into production.

Never been a fan nor will i be a fan of Toyota, Honda, I think there hole rep, has gone to there heads. My G/f has a 95 Corolla, Which is the Biggest POS, not to mention expensive has **** to fix.

FYI the Honda Ridgeline, is the most usless "Truck" Ever.

caraudiodave
08-14-2006, 08:57 PM
Your post is nonsense. Toyota's reputation was not magically created. Toyota has built solid, reliable vehicles for years and the public noticed. The domestics weren't labeled lemons or crap because people hated them. They were labeled lemons/crap because the majority of their products were and many people were burned as a result of their purchase.

Toyota's current hiccup is due to rapid growth, poor decisions and outsourcing.

its not nonsense. much of how the business goes is set up by consumer reports, review magazines, and advertising (which is what the domestics are at fault for). its a game of which came first, the chicken or the egg, heres why:

if business is hurt because of really bad reviews then people wont buy cars. if they dont buy cars. the the company wont have money ofr further development and R&D on things such as electrical systems and drivetrains.

lets say that you and I each start a business. we are i the same field. reviews of my product are great because i paid the reviewers in addition to having a slightly better product. you on the other hand, dont pay them off, or pay them off less. more people will buy my product, and thus i will have more money to further improve my product over yours. before too long, all magazines in the field fall over each other to be the first to try my product, while they interview only customers of yours that are unhappy.

after a while of that, i no longer need to worry about my quality, my customers will keep coming back to me, and make excuses about why their case is rare, while the magazines keep praising me. You company then falls into the Ford, GM, chrysler category.


just an example...i feel this is true, even though nobody talks about it. why are cars such as the civic (underpowered), camry (problem ridden), accord (overpriced) so well reviewed? meanwhile, the impala SS is said to have too much torquesteer, while the grand prix GXP (same chassis and engine) doesnt have that problem, but seems cheaply made. hmmm, those cars blow out their competition, i have yet to see a good review on them.

Braves299
08-14-2006, 09:43 PM
Hahahahaha

Braves299
08-14-2006, 09:44 PM
just an example...i feel this is true, even though nobody talks about it. why are cars such as the civic (underpowered), camry (problem ridden), accord (overpriced) so well reviewed? meanwhile, the impala SS is said to have too much torquesteer, while the grand prix GXP (same chassis and engine) doesnt have that problem, but seems cheaply made. hmmm, those cars blow out their competition, i have yet to see a good review on them.

So true...

bigbenSC
08-15-2006, 04:19 PM
just an example...i feel this is true, even though nobody talks about it. why are cars such as the civic (underpowered), camry (problem ridden), accord (overpriced) so well reviewed? meanwhile, the impala SS is said to have too much torquesteer, while the grand prix GXP (same chassis and engine) doesnt have that problem, but seems cheaply made. hmmm, those cars blow out their competition, i have yet to see a good review on them.
1.The Impala SS and GP GXP have different suspension tuning, the GP's handles the torque steer better. Either way they are both riding on a platform over a decade old that does not meet the bar set by more modern rivals.
2.The Camry is no more problem ridden than the American cars it competes with.
3.It has never been proven that the Japanese companies "paid off" car magazines to write good reviews for them.
I like my American cars as much as anyone, but the crap Ford and GM (Chrysler had some hits) sold over the last decade will take much longer to bury, even with the much improved products out now.

GregFarz78
08-15-2006, 05:36 PM
Toyota makes junk? Thats a little far fetched I just a read an article the other day on forbes I think it was that toyota is tops in reliability and american cars are all below average.

lone_wolf025
08-15-2006, 05:57 PM
I think its a case of 6 of one, half dozen of the other. Some Toyota's are bad just like some American cars are bad. Chances are you could get a new American car and luck out on maintence while the Toyota takes a dump. It happens to both sides, but granted a little less historically to Toyota. American cars IMO have more interesting engines, setups, and styles than do most Toyota's but that's just my opinion.

GregFarz78
08-15-2006, 07:29 PM
American cars IMO have more interesting engines, setups, and styles than do most Toyota's but that's just my opinion.

I agree there toyota definitely plays it safe and takes no chances in terms of style

caraudiodave
08-16-2006, 06:58 PM
well i can go according my families track record:
88 wrangler- ran like new when totalled at 185k. never reliability issues
93 intreipd- 3 trannys, 2 engines all in 4 years
96 Saturn - saved sisters life in accident, never reliability issues
99 saturn -saved sisters life in accident, never reliability issues
99 grand am- needed some maintenance, overall very reliable
00 camry- 3 times radio replaced, suspension went bad after 1 year, brakes never worked, 25k for a 4 banger
01 durango - very reliable, gas hog
05 vibe GT- reliable, but cheap interior
05 highlander - crappy tranny. dealer refuses to fix
06 g. cherokee hemi - very reliable, gas hog
05 BMW 5-series - returned via lemon law. nothing worked proerly
06 CTS-V - very reliable, gas hog, some tranny toughness, but nothing too bad
06 g35 sedan - extremely reliable


the two toyotas that my family had were pieces of crap. neither of them inexpensive by any means, and my family always takes care of their cars. ive also read online about issues with the new camry.

while the domestics arent any better than toyota, I wouldnt call them any worse, yet the magazines rate them as the domestics being pieces of crap while the toyotas are made of gold.

nobody has proven that the magazines are paid off, but its known. ive seen some magazines ellude to it.