![]() |
|
|
#441 |
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
I'd need to see a compression map for the setup to even form an opinion... Then I'd have to calculate based on the engine specs and IC setup. To lazy to even search. But if you show the range on the turbo map in the efficiency area, then I would have a bit of a clue
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
|
|
|
|
|
#442 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
![]() |
Supposedly good for 600+ hp. DSM guys love them.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#443 |
|
Wiley 'Ol Veteran
![]() AKA: Bob (aka Hoss)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Azerbaijan
Age: 45
Posts: 6,935
Vehicle: See My Signature Block
![]() |
nothing like a test data sheet from December of 1993........
__________________
2016 GoMango Challenger SRT Hellcat 2014 Redline Pearl Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT 2018 Bruiser Grey Dodge Durango SRT TRADED-2004 Black Grand Am GT,2004 Impulse Blue GTO M6, 2012 Mineral Gray Jeep SRT8, 2010 Bright Silver Jeep SRT8 LEASE TURN-IN-2006 Summit White TrailBlazer SS AWD (Vector CAI & tune) SOLD-2000 Silvermist Grand Am GT Supercharged,1994 Daytona Blue Single Turbo RX7 (427whp/330wtq), 2006 Spice Red GTO A4, 2013 Grabber Blue Shelby GT500 |
|
|
|
|
|
#444 |
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
So plot out 1.58 by 24.48 (if we are talking about a 3400). I tried to use some realistic numbers:
http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/glossa...orDutyCycle=85
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
|
|
|
|
|
#445 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
![]() |
He's running closer to 9 psi right now (~1.8) and MAF readings tell me he's flowing more like 26-28lb/min with his current turbo.
bigger turbine and eventually a boost cam and the point moves right ... More boost? and the point moves up and right... we'll see.... ricer math aside, I don't think this turbo will be a limiting factor... Last edited by Shock24Z; 08-07-2008 at 12:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#446 |
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
More boost? You would have to go above 12psi to make it effective. The cam may help with VE. That takes a bit of work and homework, unless you don't care what happens to your pistons and transmission. Going above 12psi on stock internals is not a good idea. This is not "ricer math", it is mandatory to have at least a slight understanding of components you are bolting to your car, or, see the effect referred to above. As another quick tip, anything above 7 PSI creates quite a bit of valve float with stock springs.
Pat (Schweppe23) has the best turbo for the 3400, hands down. My approach was to move forward with a T70-like turbo, which I have, but will be leaving my garage in the near future...
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
|
|
|
|
|
#447 | |||||
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Why not? Without knock present I see no reason not to. I've never heard from anyone on here whats supposed to give way first anyways. If its uncharted territory, why not be the first one to explore it? Quote:
Yea, I was joking. I did a lot of research on holsets including looking at that compressor map before suggesting a holset to him. Quote:
What is this turbo? Depending on the application that is still arguable. Quote:
Its not my car but I'm thinking 12's is his goal and 11's is a very real possibility in the future with this turbo and more mods... so he'll be just fine with what he's got. Last edited by Shock24Z; 08-07-2008 at 04:25 PM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#448 | ||
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
I think what he's trying to say is running too low boost on that turbo will move it below it's best efficiency range?
Quote:
Anyway, with good tuning and no knock, yes you can run more than 12psi. It's still not a good idea though. It's not the psi but the power level thats really the important thing. It's impossible to say "this is what HP you will break the stock pistons" because of variations in materials and machining in factory parts, however most people agree that once you start approaching 400 CHP your chances of breaking a piston go way up. Quote:
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#449 |
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
As in that turbo would require more boost to effectively be on the map. It may not spool fast enough to make you happy. You would effectively need 105% VE @ 3400 RPM to spool. Hope I am way wrong...
Pat bought a GT35R .82 ar. He also purchased a cam back in the day from cammotion, which yes, I know it helps. As for the valve float, perhaps I don't know what I am talking about, and I am simply clueless when it comes to the 3400... Then again, I might just have a little bit of experience. See: http://groomlakelabs.com/index.php?q...&g2_itemId=977 This was before my rebuild. There is a dyno chart, the winpep file, a scan of the pull, and a video. Now, for multiple choice, tell me what caused my fall off: A. A gerbil stuck in the intercooler piping. B. The blue powdercoat on the UIM. C. Valve float. Even though it has been over two years, and times that Pat and I have yet to be beaten by any other 3400 on an N-Body. It's not that I don't want to see it happen, I do. I am practically giving some things away to help some folks achieve that goal. My original goal was 13's when most folks were running14's. I simply no longer have an interest, and wish you, or your friend, all the luck in the world. You will need it if you are too closed minded to not consider advice from others.
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
|
|
|
|
|
#450 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Luke
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 331
Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am SE
![]() |
You call us close minded but you seem to be the ones who refuse to back down, whats wrong with trying to make one of the fastest grand ams with mostly stock internals (and for less than $3k)? I would think most people would like to cheer us on instead of make little jabs, if i really wanted some advice you'd see some threads from me
I'm really starting to tire from this, but what did I expect? It's the internet after all, and it is of course damn serious business |
|
|
|
|
|
#451 | ||
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
Quote:
I didn't realize this was some kind of "battle" that I was to back away from. I'm not applying pressure at all. As to making one of the fastest Grand Am's for under $3K, I did. Then I just decided to take it further. Sorry if you feel I over-engineer, but I tend to do that when I trust my life with a piece of machinery. If providing facts behind my claims when I post bothers you or your friend, then you are better off to ignore my posts. Quote:
Oh, and "I won't back down".
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#452 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Luke
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 331
Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am SE
![]() |
hmm how appropriate
at any rate, honestly, i don't think you over engineer, i just feel that this community could benefit from seeing a budget build and actually getting somewhere with it instead of another built 3400 with all forged internals and a boat load of money behind it, not to say that i would have done the same if i had the cash... |
|
|
|
|
|
#453 |
|
I hate nose hair
![]() AKA: John
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,051
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am GT sc/t
![]() |
this one is better....
and as long as it is ANY 12...ill throw my hat in with a little...alotta..bit of juice, alot of gear, and one hell of a sponsor I was aiming for the 13 sec club, but now im aiming a little lower...figuratively, by trying to break into the 12s with all engine. If i break this one...ill have another one waiting in the wings anyway
__________________
If you unscrew ur belly button, will ur butt fall off? Procrastinators UNITE!!!.....tomorrow Last edited by gectek; 08-07-2008 at 10:06 PM. Reason: throw my hat in too |
|
|
|
|
|
#454 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Luke
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 331
Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am SE
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#455 |
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
, dude, there is no reason to explain yourself. Just get finished and put down some numbers already. Summer is almost over and I want to see someone get the $. Hopefully Ben has enabled the PayPal "Money Market" on the account for the challenge in order to have the prize grow a little. Keep in mind folks, this was a 2008 challenge ya know. I'd hate to see a mod have to change the thread title.
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
|
|
|
|
|
#456 |
|
Boost Addict
![]() AKA: Nick
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St Cloud, Minnesota
Age: 31
Posts: 1,290
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am GT V6
![]() |
Yeah I really would like to see someone get the cash too. I'm working on putting down some numbers myself with the new long block but right now I have a built engine with no trans to hold the power and a non existent turbo setup so i'm not exactly going to be getting anywhere anytime soon
![]()
__________________
BUILT Turbo 3400/4t65e-HD powered Grand AM in the making. ---------------------------------- www.motorsportsevolved.com Get updates on Facebook ---------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#457 | |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
![]() |
Quote:
Also, originally a 60-1... similar to the gt35 with a .82 a/r was the ideal turbo but the holset was a deal and fits in with the whole budget scheme of things. In regards to the HX40...we'll be able to get back to you with numbers hopefully soon enough, and I'm not worried about how it will perform, especially compared to the turbo he has now. edit: aaron I've tried to look into limiting factors within the engine before but never really came up with anything solid. If theres something out there I can find with another search then you've caught me though. Last edited by Shock24Z; 08-07-2008 at 11:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458 | |
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#459 | ||
|
]\/[onster /-\lero
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Three factors that attributed: 1) Tune was good before heading to the track, however, altitude variance from where it was tuned (4700MSL) to the track where this happened (3200MSL) caused a lean condition. I added more fuel, but.....(see point 2) 2) fuel pump was not enough to keep up. That piston is the number 6, which gets the least amount of cooling (last cylinder on the cooling path) and is also last on the fuel rail. 3) stock pistons are crap for anything over 12psi, you can tune it perfectly, however you like, but whether you get detonation or not, the combustion pressures at that level are still going to weaken it over time. 3) ![]() ![]()
__________________
____________________ 4t65 swap COMPLETE! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#460 | |
|
Just a hobby...
![]() |
Quote:
Think I blew my 3400 http://www.grandamgt.com/forum/showp...6&postcount=12 Those are a few that came to mind. Haven't heard from Blight in a while. Ya know, Pontiac Nationals begins... Today! Is Mike (Milzy) going? Did he get that beast he put on a tailor and brought up back in 2006 finished yet? How long do ya need man? EDIT: D'oh! Mike, you beat me to it ![]()
__________________
Regards, Todd E. Johnson SpyhunteR's #1 fan. 99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled |
|
|
|
|