GrandAmGT.com Forum
http://www.pfyc.com GrandAmGT.com Premium Memership Signup
CustomCarGrills.com   

Go Back   GrandAmGT.com Forum > GAGT - Modifications - Sponsored by RedlineGoods.com > All Go (Performance modifications)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2008, 06:31 AM   #441
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
I'd need to see a compression map for the setup to even form an opinion... Then I'd have to calculate based on the engine specs and IC setup. To lazy to even search. But if you show the range on the turbo map in the efficiency area, then I would have a bit of a clue
__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 07:51 AM   #442
Shock24Z
GAGT - Member
 
AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
Shock24Z Still kinda new, but learning
Supposedly good for 600+ hp. DSM guys love them.

Shock24Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 08:33 AM   #443
AMRAAM4
Wiley 'Ol Veteran
 
AMRAAM4's Avatar
 
AKA: Bob (aka Hoss)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Azerbaijan
Age: 45
Posts: 6,935
Vehicle: See My Signature Block
AMRAAM4 a trusted member
nothing like a test data sheet from December of 1993........
__________________
2016 GoMango Challenger SRT Hellcat
2014 Redline Pearl Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT
2018 Bruiser Grey Dodge Durango SRT

TRADED-2004 Black Grand Am GT,2004 Impulse Blue GTO M6, 2012 Mineral Gray Jeep SRT8, 2010 Bright Silver Jeep SRT8
LEASE TURN-IN-2006 Summit White TrailBlazer SS AWD (Vector CAI & tune)
SOLD-2000 Silvermist Grand Am GT Supercharged,1994 Daytona Blue Single Turbo RX7 (427whp/330wtq), 2006 Spice Red GTO A4
, 2013 Grabber Blue Shelby GT500
AMRAAM4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 08:34 AM   #444
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shock24Z View Post
Supposedly good for 600+ hp. DSM guys love them.

So plot out 1.58 by 24.48 (if we are talking about a 3400). I tried to use some realistic numbers:

http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/glossa...orDutyCycle=85
__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 12:05 PM   #445
Shock24Z
GAGT - Member
 
AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
Shock24Z Still kinda new, but learning
He's running closer to 9 psi right now (~1.8) and MAF readings tell me he's flowing more like 26-28lb/min with his current turbo.

bigger turbine and eventually a boost cam and the point moves right ... More boost? and the point moves up and right... we'll see....

ricer math aside, I don't think this turbo will be a limiting factor...

Last edited by Shock24Z; 08-07-2008 at 12:23 PM.
Shock24Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 03:06 PM   #446
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
More boost? You would have to go above 12psi to make it effective. The cam may help with VE. That takes a bit of work and homework, unless you don't care what happens to your pistons and transmission. Going above 12psi on stock internals is not a good idea. This is not "ricer math", it is mandatory to have at least a slight understanding of components you are bolting to your car, or, see the effect referred to above. As another quick tip, anything above 7 PSI creates quite a bit of valve float with stock springs.

Pat (Schweppe23) has the best turbo for the 3400, hands down. My approach was to move forward with a T70-like turbo, which I have, but will be leaving my garage in the near future...
__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 04:06 PM   #447
Shock24Z
GAGT - Member
 
AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
Shock24Z Still kinda new, but learning
Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
More boost? You would have to go above 12psi to make it effective.
I don't see what your saying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
The cam may help with VE. That takes a bit of work and homework, unless you don't care what happens to your pistons and transmission.
It will help... more air at an equivilant psi. If we get this turbo on before camming I'll be able to tell you just how much more...The tranny will be built when funds are available.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
Going above 12psi on stock internals is not a good idea.
Why not? Without knock present I see no reason not to. I've never heard from anyone on here whats supposed to give way first anyways. If its uncharted territory, why not be the first one to explore it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
This is not "ricer math", it is mandatory to have at least a slight understanding of components you are bolting to your car, or, see the effect referred to above.

Yea, I was joking. I did a lot of research on holsets including looking at that compressor map before suggesting a holset to him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
As another quick tip, anything above 7 PSI creates quite a bit of valve float with stock springs.
I've seen otherwise... for over a year. Springs after camming I would say is necessary though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
Pat (Schweppe23) has the best turbo for the 3400, hands down.
What is this turbo? Depending on the application that is still arguable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
My approach was to move forward with a T70-like turbo, which I have, but will be leaving my garage in the near future...
Did you plan to run 10's?

Its not my car but I'm thinking 12's is his goal and 11's is a very real possibility in the future with this turbo and more mods... so he'll be just fine with what he's got.

Last edited by Shock24Z; 08-07-2008 at 04:25 PM.
Shock24Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 04:40 PM   #448
AaronGTR
BlingWithBallz
 
AaronGTR's Avatar
 
AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
AaronGTR has made plenty of valid pointsAaronGTR has made plenty of valid points
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shock24Z View Post
I don't see what your saying.
I think what he's trying to say is running too low boost on that turbo will move it below it's best efficiency range?

Quote:
Why not? Without knock present I see no reason not to. I've never heard from anyone on here whats supposed to give way first anyways. If its uncharted territory, why not be the first one to explore it?
It's not uncharted territory, and if you haven't seen what gives way first on this engine, you need to do some more searching here and on 60degreev6. It's the pistons. They are the weakest link, followed by the timing chain of course, and the rods. You can do a good mild build with forged pistons and shot peened/cryo treated stock rods, but for a high power build billet SBC rods are a good idea.

Anyway, with good tuning and no knock, yes you can run more than 12psi. It's still not a good idea though. It's not the psi but the power level thats really the important thing. It's impossible to say "this is what HP you will break the stock pistons" because of variations in materials and machining in factory parts, however most people agree that once you start approaching 400 CHP your chances of breaking a piston go way up.




Quote:
I've seen otherwise... for over a year. Springs after camming I would say is necessary though.
I've also seen otherwise, on my own engine and others, with dyno testing to confirm. Add to that I've also talked personally with a GM engineer responsible for working on the grand am and he said the stock 3400 valve springs are barely adequate and can float even on stock engines with high miles. Obviously for a cam you have to use stiffer springs. Even without a cam though if you are running boost and/or a raised rev limit, you should go to AT LEAST LS1 springs.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted!
13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011)
See it here. the total package.
AaronGTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 06:55 PM   #449
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
As in that turbo would require more boost to effectively be on the map. It may not spool fast enough to make you happy. You would effectively need 105% VE @ 3400 RPM to spool. Hope I am way wrong...

Pat bought a GT35R .82 ar. He also purchased a cam back in the day from cammotion, which yes, I know it helps.

As for the valve float, perhaps I don't know what I am talking about, and I am simply clueless when it comes to the 3400... Then again, I might just have a little bit of experience. See:

http://groomlakelabs.com/index.php?q...&g2_itemId=977

This was before my rebuild. There is a dyno chart, the winpep file, a scan of the pull, and a video. Now, for multiple choice, tell me what caused my fall off:

A. A gerbil stuck in the intercooler piping.
B. The blue powdercoat on the UIM.
C. Valve float.

Even though it has been over two years, and times that Pat and I have yet to be beaten by any other 3400 on an N-Body. It's not that I don't want to see it happen, I do. I am practically giving some things away to help some folks achieve that goal. My original goal was 13's when most folks were running14's. I simply no longer have an interest, and wish you, or your friend, all the luck in the world. You will need it if you are too closed minded to not consider advice from others.
__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 09:13 PM   #450
angrysk8r
GAGT - Member
 
AKA: Luke
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 331
Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am SE
angrysk8r Gettin' there
You call us close minded but you seem to be the ones who refuse to back down, whats wrong with trying to make one of the fastest grand ams with mostly stock internals (and for less than $3k)? I would think most people would like to cheer us on instead of make little jabs, if i really wanted some advice you'd see some threads from me

I'm really starting to tire from this, but what did I expect? It's the internet after all, and it is of course damn serious business
angrysk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 09:46 PM   #451
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
Quote:
Originally Posted by angrysk8r View Post
You call us close minded but you seem to be the ones who refuse to back down, whats wrong with trying to make one of the fastest grand ams with mostly stock internals (and for less than $3k)?
Luke,

I didn't realize this was some kind of "battle" that I was to back away from. I'm not applying pressure at all. As to making one of the fastest Grand Am's for under $3K, I did. Then I just decided to take it further. Sorry if you feel I over-engineer, but I tend to do that when I trust my life with a piece of machinery. If providing facts behind my claims when I post bothers you or your friend, then you are better off to ignore my posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by angrysk8r View Post
I would think most people would like to cheer us on instead of make little jabs, if i really wanted some advice you'd see some threads from me

I'm really starting to tire from this, but what did I expect? It's the internet after all, and it is of course damn serious business
I feel that the thing that set me off was the inappropriate reference of "ricer" math with no apologies your friend made, yet refer to it as a "joke". You on the other hand, I made no reference to. I really wish you all the luck in the world.

Oh, and "I won't back down".

__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 10:01 PM   #452
angrysk8r
GAGT - Member
 
AKA: Luke
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 331
Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am SE
angrysk8r Gettin' there
hmm how appropriate

at any rate, honestly, i don't think you over engineer, i just feel that this community could benefit from seeing a budget build and actually getting somewhere with it instead of another built 3400 with all forged internals and a boat load of money behind it, not to say that i would have done the same if i had the cash...
angrysk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 10:03 PM   #453
gectek
I hate nose hair
 
gectek's Avatar
 
AKA: John
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,051
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am GT sc/t
gectek Gettin' there
this one is better....


and as long as it is ANY 12...ill throw my hat in with a little...alotta..bit of juice, alot of gear, and one hell of a sponsor
I was aiming for the 13 sec club, but now im aiming a little lower...figuratively, by trying to break into the 12s with all engine.
If i break this one...ill have another one waiting in the wings anyway
__________________
If you unscrew ur belly button, will ur butt fall off?

Procrastinators UNITE!!!.....tomorrow

Last edited by gectek; 08-07-2008 at 10:06 PM. Reason: throw my hat in too
gectek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 10:18 PM   #454
angrysk8r
GAGT - Member
 
AKA: Luke
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 331
Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am SE
angrysk8r Gettin' there
Quote:
Originally Posted by angrysk8r View Post
at any rate, honestly, i don't think you over engineer
don't take that the wrong way either, i meant it as in you're doing what i would do in the same situation
angrysk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 11:06 PM   #455
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
, dude, there is no reason to explain yourself. I am not that over-sensitive, and I don't read into things.

Just get finished and put down some numbers already. Summer is almost over and I want to see someone get the $. Hopefully Ben has enabled the PayPal "Money Market" on the account for the challenge in order to have the prize grow a little.

Keep in mind folks, this was a 2008 challenge ya know. I'd hate to see a mod have to change the thread title.
__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 11:20 PM   #456
Nick-G
Boost Addict
 
Nick-G's Avatar
 
AKA: Nick
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St Cloud, Minnesota
Age: 31
Posts: 1,290
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am GT V6
Nick-G Gettin' there
Yeah I really would like to see someone get the cash too. I'm working on putting down some numbers myself with the new long block but right now I have a built engine with no trans to hold the power and a non existent turbo setup so i'm not exactly going to be getting anywhere anytime soon
__________________
BUILT Turbo 3400/4t65e-HD powered Grand AM in the making.

----------------------------------
www.motorsportsevolved.com
Get updates on Facebook
----------------------------------
Nick-G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 11:22 PM   #457
Shock24Z
GAGT - Member
 
AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Age: 32
Posts: 371
Vehicle: 98 Grand Prix GTP
Shock24Z Still kinda new, but learning
Quote:
Originally Posted by tejohnson View Post
As in that turbo would require more boost to effectively be on the map. It may not spool fast enough to make you happy. You would effectively need 105% VE @ 3400 RPM to spool. Hope I am way wrong...

Pat bought a GT35R .82 ar. He also purchased a cam back in the day from cammotion, which yes, I know it helps.

As for the valve float, perhaps I don't know what I am talking about, and I am simply clueless when it comes to the 3400... Then again, I might just have a little bit of experience. See:

http://groomlakelabs.com/index.php?q...&g2_itemId=977

This was before my rebuild. There is a dyno chart, the winpep file, a scan of the pull, and a video. Now, for multiple choice, tell me what caused my fall off:

A. A gerbil stuck in the intercooler piping.
B. The blue powdercoat on the UIM.
C. Valve float.
Believe me I don't doubt your knowledge of 3400's... I've probably learned more from your posts, pictures and whatnot than anyone else's. However, I do believe that I'm at a point where I no longer take what other people say for granted... this is not to say I don't believe you or allow it to go out the other ear. I'm at a point where I don't need to here what someone else has to say about running x psi... I'll more than likely be with luke scanning and making sure it doesn't blow up and learning from the entire experience.

Also, originally a 60-1... similar to the gt35 with a .82 a/r was the ideal turbo but the holset was a deal and fits in with the whole budget scheme of things.

In regards to the HX40...we'll be able to get back to you with numbers hopefully soon enough, and I'm not worried about how it will perform, especially compared to the turbo he has now.

edit: aaron I've tried to look into limiting factors within the engine before but never really came up with anything solid. If theres something out there I can find with another search then you've caught me though.

Last edited by Shock24Z; 08-07-2008 at 11:32 PM.
Shock24Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 11:37 PM   #458
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick-G View Post
Yeah I really would like to see someone get the cash too. I'm working on putting down some numbers myself with the new long block but right now I have a built engine with no trans to hold the power and a non existent turbo setup so i'm not exactly going to be getting anywhere anytime soon
I think you need to toss that engine in NOW and get the smallest pulley you can use on that blower Of course, you may want to exchange that FFP UD pulley with a stock harmonic balancer
__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 11:56 PM   #459
BlackJack
]\/[onster /-\lero
 
AKA: BlackJack
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Riley, KS
Posts: 99
Vehicle: 2003 Alero
BlackJack Gettin' there
Send a message via ICQ to BlackJack Send a message via AIM to BlackJack Send a message via MSN to BlackJack Send a message via Yahoo to BlackJack
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronGTR View Post
It's not uncharted territory, and if you haven't seen what gives way first on this engine, you need to do some more searching here and on 60degreev6. It's the pistons..........most people agree that once you start approaching 400 CHP your chances of breaking a piston go way up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shock24Z View Post
aaron I've tried to look into limiting factors within the engine before but never really came up with anything solid. If theres something out there I can find with another search then you've caught me though.
Allow me to back up aaron's point with a few pics of my recent incident, that way you'll know it isn't just unfounded speculation........

Three factors that attributed:
1) Tune was good before heading to the track, however, altitude variance from where it was tuned (4700MSL) to the track where this happened (3200MSL) caused a lean condition. I added more fuel, but.....(see point 2)
2) fuel pump was not enough to keep up. That piston is the number 6, which gets the least amount of cooling (last cylinder on the cooling path) and is also last on the fuel rail.
3) stock pistons are crap for anything over 12psi, you can tune it perfectly, however you like, but whether you get detonation or not, the combustion pressures at that level are still going to weaken it over time.
3)

__________________
____________________

4t65 swap COMPLETE!
BlackJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 11:57 PM   #460
tejohnson
Just a hobby...
 
tejohnson's Avatar
 
AKA: Todd
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Parkersburg, WV && Philadelphia, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,717
Vehicle: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500
tejohnson Gettin' there
Send a message via Yahoo to tejohnson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shock24Z View Post
edit: aaron I've tried to look into limiting factors within the engine before but never really came up with anything solid. If theres something out there I can find with another search then you've caught me though.
http://www.aleromod.com/forums/showt...ghlight=piston
Think I blew my 3400
http://www.grandamgt.com/forum/showp...6&postcount=12

Those are a few that came to mind. Haven't heard from Blight in a while.

Ya know, Pontiac Nationals begins... Today! Is Mike (Milzy) going? Did he get that beast he put on a tailor and brought up back in 2006 finished yet? How long do ya need man?

EDIT: D'oh! Mike, you beat me to it
__________________
Regards,

Todd E. Johnson

SpyhunteR's #1 fan.

99 Grand Am (13.4@108) - Recycled
tejohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 GrandAmGT.com
CustomCarGrills.com