![]() |
|
|
#21 |
|
Skinny Wolfe
![]() AKA: Randy
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Age: 41
Posts: 788
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am Gt
![]() |
Thought so. So where did you get yours from?
__________________
2002 Grand Am GT Turbocharged Garrett GT35 / Turbo Headers / 2.5" high flow DP / Custom SLP Exhaust / Ported 3500 Heads / Ported 3500 UIM/LIM / 65mm TB / Turbonetics Evolution WG / Greddy Type-RS BOV / Casper Adjustable FPR / Casper High Speed Fan Switch / Speedbuilt F/R STB's / Next Level F/R Sway bars / Eibach Springs / Dual Gauge Pod with Aeroforce Gauges / DDM 5000K HID's / Big Four Upgrade / HP Tuners and more! "Living is doing everything you want to do and dying is everything else" |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Torre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aurora (Chicago), Illinois
Posts: 317
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT Sedan
![]() |
zzp.
__________________
2006 Volvo S60R - 300HP, 300TQ - Stock, for now 1999 Grand Am SC/T - 301HP, 365TQ - Gone, but not forgotten. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
lolGM
![]() AKA: Colin
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 1,102
Vehicle: 2001 Impreza 2.5 RS
![]() |
http://shop.zzperformance.com/store/...Injectors.aspx
42.5's http://shop.zzperformance.com/store/...Injectors.aspx 60's 60's are like 10 dollars more...again... why not? |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
always cuttin' up
![]() AKA: MAC
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: TAMPA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,165
Vehicle: Red 99 GT coupe
![]() |
^ you act like theres nothing wrong with going way too big on injectors. too big can be a problem iirc. i'm almost stock so should i go ahead and do the 60lbs anyways b/c of my CAI?
when you get too big of an injector it sprays for such a short amount of time and sprays so furiously that fuel can puddle instead of atomizing.
__________________
![]() 2009 G8 gt no more Big Gears, buh-bye coilovers... illusions of making this a racecar have passed. 12.78 @112.. not a bad grocery getter -still LOUD AS FCK though 2006 GTO completely stock. rip at 39k. 99 GAGT 108k miles, Borla cat-back, CAI, 65mm TB, EGR delete, WOT-tech intakes, F-Body Brakes w/ Hawk HPS pads. Suede headliner, heated seats, jvc HU, infinity speakers+amp+subs, LEDs -probably less than 1000 miles on it in the last 3 years... |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Elitest Prick
![]() AKA: jon
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: dayton
Posts: 284
Vehicle: 240sx
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
ForcedFabllc.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
BoOsTiN'
![]() AKA: slograndam
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,700
Vehicle: ev0m0de
![]() |
external wastegate is much easier to mess around with, you're not as restricted. and when it opens up, make a helluva badass sounding car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Again, zuki showing how clueless he really is about turbos. You don't need an external waste gate. Not with those manifolds and a 2.5" DP. Externals can give slightly better response and boost control, and they are definitely better for higher power levels where an internal one might not provide enough flow to prevent over spinning the turbine, but for lower to medium power levels an internal waste gate is plenty sufficient and should be easier to work with on your setup since it takes up less space. You don't have to have a lot of room then to fit the piping and the waste gate.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
lolGM
![]() AKA: Colin
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 1,102
Vehicle: 2001 Impreza 2.5 RS
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Elitest Prick
![]() AKA: jon
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: dayton
Posts: 284
Vehicle: 240sx
![]() |
Quote:
thats the whole reason for a tune... you should never change injector size with out actually changing things in the PCM. for him 60's would probably not have much of a problem idling and would be good to have so he would not have to upgrade later when he wants to crank up the boost. and anyone with a turbo car will tell you it only takes a few hours of driving to realize you are going to surpass what you had in mind as good enough HP and boost.
__________________
ForcedFabllc.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Elitest Prick
![]() AKA: jon
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: dayton
Posts: 284
Vehicle: 240sx
![]() |
internal gate is easier. you bolt on turbo hook up a vacuum line and you have instant wastegate. external you have to make a dump tube figure out where to place the gate and then fab up a pipe and flange to mount it on. an it sounds like **** running open dump all the time. its like nice exhaust note then bam exhaust leak..
__________________
ForcedFabllc.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | ||
|
Skinny Wolfe
![]() AKA: Randy
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Age: 41
Posts: 788
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am Gt
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2002 Grand Am GT Turbocharged Garrett GT35 / Turbo Headers / 2.5" high flow DP / Custom SLP Exhaust / Ported 3500 Heads / Ported 3500 UIM/LIM / 65mm TB / Turbonetics Evolution WG / Greddy Type-RS BOV / Casper Adjustable FPR / Casper High Speed Fan Switch / Speedbuilt F/R STB's / Next Level F/R Sway bars / Eibach Springs / Dual Gauge Pod with Aeroforce Gauges / DDM 5000K HID's / Big Four Upgrade / HP Tuners and more! "Living is doing everything you want to do and dying is everything else" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
BoOsTiN'
![]() AKA: slograndam
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,700
Vehicle: ev0m0de
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Dude, shut up already. You are an F'in idiot. As for injector sizing.... yes, you technically can have too large an injector, even if you tune for it. There is a limit to how short you can make in injector pulse and how far you can turn down fuel pressure before you don't have a good spray pattern and get good atomization. You might be able to get the car to idle, but it won't idle well and will run dirty at low throttle. That said, I don't think 60 lb/hr injectors would really be big enough to have that issue... but I also don't think they are necessary to support the power level he will probably hit with the other hardware he is planning to use. I think 42's would be enough. But ya know... do your own research and make your own decisions.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. Last edited by AaronGTR; 01-01-2012 at 10:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Grand Am Enthusiast
![]() |
Ok to help you with the problem and to keep you from listening to opinion, here is the formula. It is you goal BHP times BSFC which is typically a value of .60 for boosted applications. then you divide that by the number of injectors by the percentage of duty cycle you wish to run, (BHPX.60/6x.80) the recommended is 80% to get the most life and efficiency from the injectors, and to answer your question 42 lbs is not stock for any fbody. I believe 26 and 28 lbs were stock sizes.
How much boost do you plan on running? If you plan to make 400 bhp 50 lb injectors are the correct size to maintain the 80% duty cycle. Here is a link to a site that has the formula. http://www.rceng.com/technical.aspx
__________________
My Baby Mods: Currently under reconstruction... Pacesetter Exhaust, GT Rims, Tan Leather interior from GT, MMS Stock Tune, 180 tstat, MPRacing CAI, CMS Springs, Monroe Struts. Soon to come: Possible turbo build. New Car:2000 Z28 hardtop automatic, Cammed, lid, headers and full exhaust no cats, magnaflow cat back. Built trans and 3800 stall conveter. Runs 7.42 at 92.55 mph (it's a small cam 228/228 .588/.588 112 LSA) Pending a t56 manual swap and possible 6.0L with a turbo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
BoOsTiN'
![]() AKA: slograndam
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,700
Vehicle: ev0m0de
![]() |
I'm an idiot because my car on its best day barely runs and has never run as good as yours?
Last edited by AaronGTR; 01-03-2012 at 05:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Yes. And because you don't know wtf you are talking about... ever. ![]()
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
So that's Vtec...
![]() |
This is why nobody takes you seriously. Ever.
__________________
![]() 2015 Honda Accord Sport Sedan: K24W 2003 Mitsubishi Galant ES: 4G64 |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
BoOsTiN'
![]() AKA: slograndam
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,700
Vehicle: ev0m0de
![]() |
You weld 2 flanges, one on the crossover, one on the downpipe, set the wastegate on top of it... there ya go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
It's not that simple. Not if you want it to work properly. But then... you don't know anything about designing turbo systems, and your car never worked properly... so I don't expect you to understand.
![]()
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Elitest Prick
![]() AKA: jon
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: dayton
Posts: 284
Vehicle: 240sx
![]() |
Quote:
cost of the gate 250.00 for a real tial. cost to have that made by even a hack fabrication shop 65-130.00. then honestly some shops wont work on the stuff he bought. I almost denied the previous owner to even mess with it. imagine that a shop modifys that stuff and then the customer goes around telling people such and such shop did this. that shop now looks like it does bad quality work for people and the people with real money to spend will shy away. I know from experiance. i am a very capable and talented fabricator and doing these repair and mod jobs has burnt my rep with some higher end jobs until they see my actual high end work from other customers. a internal gate turbo is just simpler for not much power. hell we have made 400hp on a 2L 4 cylinder with internal gated GT2871 turbos. as for turbos, stick with garrett. i shy away from turbonectics. the failure rate we experienced while we were distributors was way too high to continue selling them. i am not talking 1 or 5 i am talking 50-70K worth in a few years. we had pretty good luck with masterpower from brazil over 40K of turbos sold and only 3 defective and those were more then likely from non primed startups. we are a garrett retailer if you need a source to them. i can get fairly good pricing if you have a size or HP goal in mind. as for injectors, you do run the risk of having idle problems the larger you go, how ever 60lbs is not that big and should be easy to tune for and have still idle like factory. you will need tuned and you will need to bring the car to a tuner with dyno access. so i would assume you would come down and see milzy to get that handled. a mail order tune will not suffice. your power goal dictates your injector choice, i always suggest to buy one size up from your original goal because more often then not the customer ends up wanting more then they thought and then have to sell and replace injectors which they could have just done a bigger to start and been alright.
__________________
ForcedFabllc.com |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|