![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Sean
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 229
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am
![]() |
Anyone see these?? Scam?? Too good to be true at that price??
Browsing Ebay. I have an 02 GA 3.4. No fancy turbo just a regular 3.4
For $25 you gotta be kidding?? When I first purchased my GA 10 years ago brand new power chips were like $250+ Are they cheap now because an 02 is considered an old model?? Are these chips advising premium fuel like most chips?? I always felt chips requiring premium fuel wiped out any chip advantage in fuel savings just for the fact you have to spend extra $$$$ to make the chip do its thing Anyways....have a peek..... http://www.ebay.com/itm/PERFORMANCE-...88fc71&vxp=mtr Last edited by sugar ray; 04-06-2012 at 01:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Sean
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 229
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am
![]() |
NEVER MIND!!! found this post in another forum. Looks like its nothing more then a resistor over that fancy cover:
QUOTE:i bought one for my buic park ave didnt see any difference, might have been less fuel milage. took it off and tore it apare. the only thing inside the filling material (to hide what is inside) was the two wires connected to a 2kohms 20% resistor. real hi tech huh!!! they even used the cheapest resistor they could find... this is a big rip off and i should have know better. tried to contact the company to thank them for the rip off but i cant get past their faq questions.... mever again...ps spread the word |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
lolGM
![]() AKA: Colin
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 1,102
Vehicle: 2001 Impreza 2.5 RS
![]() |
Most people don't buy these...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
~Turbocharged~
![]() AKA: Randy
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Age: 37
Posts: 1,265
Vehicle: 99 GAGT, 07 Vette
![]() |
Fuel chips are worthless! Go boost or go home.
__________________
400whp 435wtq - MMS Race Block w/ 8.5:1 comp ratio, Eagle H-beam rods. MMS Stage 2 heads, Turbo Cam, chromemoly pushrods, GM gaskets. MMS 65 mm Turbo Kit w 60lb/hr injectors, Walbro fuel pump, powdercoated engine. MMS 3.29 4t65eHD conv., 3500 stall TC. Milzy headers w/ downpipe, magnaflow exhaust, FFP Pulley, f/r strut braces, Msd 8.5 SC wires, *** bodykit, Bilstein Coilovers. 17x8 AE 185s. Pioneer HU, B/A speakers. Baer brakes. Wot-tech engine mount. SB Rear Swaybar. ES Poly links |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
710ci...per cylinder
![]() AKA: mitch conner
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Vehicle: 1999 ga gt1.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
~Turbocharged~
![]() AKA: Randy
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Age: 37
Posts: 1,265
Vehicle: 99 GAGT, 07 Vette
![]() |
It was a joke man.....I agree that boosting these cars are expensive to make reliable but it's doable. Most of the problems I've had could of been avoided though.
__________________
400whp 435wtq - MMS Race Block w/ 8.5:1 comp ratio, Eagle H-beam rods. MMS Stage 2 heads, Turbo Cam, chromemoly pushrods, GM gaskets. MMS 65 mm Turbo Kit w 60lb/hr injectors, Walbro fuel pump, powdercoated engine. MMS 3.29 4t65eHD conv., 3500 stall TC. Milzy headers w/ downpipe, magnaflow exhaust, FFP Pulley, f/r strut braces, Msd 8.5 SC wires, *** bodykit, Bilstein Coilovers. 17x8 AE 185s. Pioneer HU, B/A speakers. Baer brakes. Wot-tech engine mount. SB Rear Swaybar. ES Poly links Last edited by blckgagt; 04-06-2012 at 12:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
With the quickness
![]() AKA: Brendan
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N.Brookfield ,ma
Age: 39
Posts: 2,421
Vehicle: 03 Outback H6
![]() ![]() |
since they are a complete joke and worthless.
gotta give the guy who makes them props along with all the suckers he get's to buy them. for the obvious reason of it would be cool |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
lolGM
![]() AKA: Colin
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 1,102
Vehicle: 2001 Impreza 2.5 RS
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
710ci...per cylinder
![]() AKA: mitch conner
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Vehicle: 1999 ga gt1.
![]() |
Fuel chips are a scam...no doubt and everyone calls them out but a cai is a waste of money on a stock engine and everyone acts like it should be one of your first engine mods. The stock airbox and ducting with a clean hiflow filter prob can support 250hp with ease. If u think u need more induction a larger throttle body is not much more expensive than a cai would cost. The exhaust on these cars is the first restriction to making power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
710ci...per cylinder
![]() AKA: mitch conner
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Vehicle: 1999 ga gt1.
![]() |
FALSE.... A two stoke makes better power under boost than a four stroke. The turbocharger on an emd710 weighs as much three grandams..
Last edited by locoman99; 04-06-2012 at 02:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
BoOsTiN'
![]() AKA: slograndam
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,700
Vehicle: ev0m0de
![]() |
3xxx's aren't good platforms to boost?? JACKASS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
Total scam. If it was that easy to add 35hp AND get 4mpg better by plugging in a $25 part.... the manufacturer would have designed the car with it from the beginning! OEM's spend millions of dollars fine tuning drive train management systems that will give the maximum HP possible while being within the fuel mileage and emissions target of their market for a given car, and while keeping a margin of safety for reliable operation and long life of the vehicle.
Any cheap gimmick product like this most likely either doesn't work at all... or it improves one aspect while sacrificing one or more of the others.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
710ci...per cylinder
![]() AKA: mitch conner
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Vehicle: 1999 ga gt1.
![]() |
No, not really, especially in an n body ... 60v6 in an fbody, maybe. There is nothing about this engine or this platform that lends itself to being boosted. a pushrod v6 transverse mount fwd with a weak transaxle with little aftermarker support does not lend itself well to boosting. Sorry thats the truth. Will it make more power? Yes..any engine would. It can be done..no doubt anything can be, i am not saying that. But spending ten grand in upgrades to turn a high 14 second car into a 13 second car speaks for itself in terms of practicality.
Last edited by locoman99; 04-06-2012 at 05:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Unfortunately I have to agree with you. And I speak from experience. Yes, the engine responds reasonably well to boost and makes more HP... but it is NOT cheap or easy to boost one of these engines. The efficiency is also limited by the engine/trans configuration and space available in the engine bay. Just look at the lengths to which Nick-G has gone in turbo build in his efforts to maximize the potential of his build. Eliminating many components and systems, relocating things such as the PS pump, and even rotating the intake manifold. Costly, difficult, and far from stock. And yes, then there is the crappy stock trans, the expense and limited availability of parts, and limited experience and testing of high power boosted setups in the community.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: josh
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boise Iowa
Posts: 35
Vehicle: 2004 GT
![]() |
That exact chip worked for my uncle. He put it in an 04 Grand Prix and he got a 23 HP gain. And now gets 6 MPG more.I was shocked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
BoOsTiN'
![]() AKA: slograndam
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,700
Vehicle: ev0m0de
![]() |
Quote:
I ran a 14.013 @ 103mph with no first gear, slipping trans, exhaust leak, on 4 psi in 2nd, 10 psi in 3rd. If I would've had my trans fixed by then I'm willing to put money on low 13s on 6 psi. maybe even closer to 13 flat/high 12s on a higher psi like 12. I've spent 1300 on my setup. IMO Transmission was really the only flaw... But I did blow a headgasket when I spiked 17 psi messing around with a Bolted on GTO. It went up way to quick to let off and by that time coolant was everywhere. (But 17 psi Felt like it pulled harder then my friends vortec supercharged mustang... No joke )Last edited by zukiracer19; 04-06-2012 at 05:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
710ci...per cylinder
![]() AKA: mitch conner
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Vehicle: 1999 ga gt1.
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Ps. it was the goat was the one messing around with you..not the other way around. Last edited by locoman99; 04-06-2012 at 06:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
BoOsTiN'
![]() AKA: slograndam
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 2,700
Vehicle: ev0m0de
![]() |
My car is faster then the goat, I gave him a ride before we raced on 15 psi and he said I'll beat him
. I pulled him hard till it creeped.Cars I've raced at track go as: LS1 RX7, Built Supra, SRT-4, Ford Lightning. The ford lightning was low 12s high 11s all night, I heard him over talking saying it was stock from factory lmao... yea right. Last edited by zukiracer19; 04-06-2012 at 06:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
710ci...per cylinder
![]() AKA: mitch conner
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Vehicle: 1999 ga gt1.
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
I call BS on this too.... but then again that's normal for you zuki.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|