![]() |
|
|
#41 |
|
Modding madness
![]() AKA: Sean
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY area
Posts: 270
Vehicle: 08 F150 XTR
![]() |
I prefer not to talk about it in here as it will start more stupid $hit. PM me if you wanna know brother
Last edited by StormTec2.0; 08-20-2013 at 01:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
▂ ▃ ▅ ▆ █ ▆ ▅ ▃ ▂
![]() AKA: Nathan
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Unknown.
Posts: 5,911
Vehicle: 2001 olds alero GLS
![]() |
Smart move, and understandable. You sir have a PM.
__________________
2001 | Alero GLS | 3400 | 6MT ![]() 2012 BMW S1000RR, full exhaust, BRENTUNE, power commander 5, dyno tune, 198WHP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | ||
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Basically without modding the entire intake and exhaust tract you aren't going to move a significantly great volume of air. You need things like ported heads and a cam as well. Or boost. Those things change the volumetric efficiency. Otherwise you are just gaining power by reducing pumping losses. Not by getting more air into the cylinders. Quote:
Well, no one knows everything, but I've seen you and lots of other people on here make incorrect, uninformed statements like the first comment. Then I have to spend my time contradicting them and trying to educate people about mods so they don't buy worthless crap that won't help them. Like I said, you need to research volumetric efficiency. Basically it's the engines ability to take in air compared to the total volume of the cylinders. Imagine an engine with no cylinder heads on, and the pistons moving up and down. There is absolutely nothing blocking the air, so the cylinders with be completely filled on each revolution. This would be 100% volumetric efficiency (VE). Of course real engines very rarely approach this theoretical number, and never in NA form. In order to create compression and power, there has to be cylinder heads. To get the air in and out you have to have intake and exhaust ports, valves, camshafts, intake and exhaust, etc etc. All this creates air friction and reduces the amount of air the engine takes in. When the piston moves down it creates suction. The valves open and pull air through the whole intake. If the pistons were moving slow, the air would move slow also, there would be less friction, and the cylinder would get completely filled. The pistons have to move fast to create power though since HP = torque x rpm. Since they move fast the piston creates greater suction, air speed and friction increases, and thereby resistance. The cylinder doesn't get completely filled and there is actually vacuum in the cylinders when the compression stroke starts before the intake valve closes. Engines are basically air pumps. Some of the power they make is lost to mechanical friction, and some is lost by the power required to pump the air in and out (a lot of fuel energy is lost to heat, but that's another topic). You can gain power by reducing those pumping losses without significantly changing the VE. If you modify enough of the intake/exhaust tract to significantly reduce air friction, you can get more air in the cylinder and change the VE. If you change the cam shaft you change how fast and how much the valve opens and for how long, and that significantly affects the VE. That also is why a cammed car requires more tuning. But you won't make a really significant power increase without either a fully modded intake/exhaust and a cam, or boost or nitrous.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. Last edited by AaronGTR; 08-20-2013 at 07:56 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
not this alero
![]() AKA: Greg
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fort Knox area, KY
Age: 71
Posts: 1,301
Vehicle: 1999 Alero V6
![]() |
![]()
__________________
1999 GLS MP90 supercharged / 2003 GL MP62 supercharged / 2004 GLS stock Magnuson MP90 / TOG's / 3 in. Magnaflow exhaust / MSD ignition / LS1 MAF / Racetronix pump / HP Tuners / TCE 68mm TB / 36 lb Inj = Best track time: 12.951 @ 104.48, 1.839 60 ft. (Beech Bend Raceway Park, 11-23-13), 50 Deg. F http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpVYZPbpPzk |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
2.4L noob
![]() AKA: Bryle
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 28
Posts: 134
Vehicle: 01 GA SE1 & 04 TSX
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
710ci...per cylinder
![]() AKA: mitch conner
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 518
Vehicle: 1999 ga gt1.
![]() |
The biggest mistake most make in engine modifications is at the start.
After you decide you are not going to boost an engine, your very next decision should be selecting a cam profile. All part selections are dependent on the camshaft profile.. Valve timing is the overriding factor in what you want out of an engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Dammit Sleepy
![]() AKA: Cooper
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IA
Posts: 4,078
Vehicle: 03 Sierra Z71
![]() ![]() |
Who was testing that AleroBBB? Surely that wasn't something GM actually did, was it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
not this alero
![]() AKA: Greg
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fort Knox area, KY
Age: 71
Posts: 1,301
Vehicle: 1999 Alero V6
![]() |
Quote:
http://www.highperformancepontiac.com/ After searching an old thread on here, I'm bummed out because I thought I had the first set of TOG headers made for the 3400, but the original set John (APOC) had were "nickel coated" not ceramic like I have ![]()
__________________
1999 GLS MP90 supercharged / 2003 GL MP62 supercharged / 2004 GLS stock Magnuson MP90 / TOG's / 3 in. Magnaflow exhaust / MSD ignition / LS1 MAF / Racetronix pump / HP Tuners / TCE 68mm TB / 36 lb Inj = Best track time: 12.951 @ 104.48, 1.839 60 ft. (Beech Bend Raceway Park, 11-23-13), 50 Deg. F http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpVYZPbpPzk |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|