![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pontiac Solstice...Anyone plan on getting one?
What do you people think of the Solstice thats coming out next fall? It looks sweet i think but kinda pathetic in the options department.
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
GAGT - Junkie
![]() AKA: Nick
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southeast
Posts: 3,817
Vehicle: Charger 392
![]() |
I'm too lazy... I know what it looks like, but LINK a brotha up to see the options please! Thanks
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
See the attachment. i like the manual tranny and the rear wheel drive but only a 2.4l w/ 170hp |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
GAGT - Junkie
![]() AKA: Nick
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southeast
Posts: 3,817
Vehicle: Charger 392
![]() |
ew, not the car, but the engine size!!! is that the biggest engine size they are going to offer with the solstice?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Camaro Junkie
![]() AKA: Jon
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orefield, PA
Age: 39
Posts: 3,638
Vehicle: 06 Jeep/10 Camaro SSRS
![]() |
I believe there's an Ecotec s/c out there. Plus that thing is pretty light, good power to weight ratio. It's grown on me, I really like it actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
it seems quite affordable, starting at around 20k .. i think ill take 3 :P
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
RIP 4/25/96-6/25/05
![]() |
It's..... cute?? Kinda looks like the MR2 Spyder from the front.
I remember reading about the s/c too.. n it says the 2.4 will produce "up to" 170hp..
__________________
Grand Visions ~ East Coast My N-Body || My CarDomain E/T: 16.33 @ 84.96, R/T .071 RIP Grand Am 8/2000 - 3/13/2006 AMRAAM4: you are my hero Mel! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
WannaBe Fat Kid
![]() |
its the same 2.4 ecotech thats supposed to go into the g6
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Scrap scrap!
![]() |
weak. and it looks like a toy. How does that hood open?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Slow 5.0
![]() |
The day I bought my car, I saw one on the expressway...all I gotta say is gay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
OU Sucks!
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
GAGT - Junkie
![]() AKA: Michael
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northglenn, CO USA
Age: 49
Posts: 3,394
Vehicle: 2015 Chrysler 200S AWD
![]() |
2 seater no thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Operation .500
![]() AKA: J
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: -
Posts: 484
Vehicle: -
![]() |
I think it looks hot...the pricetag is appealing to me, might be looking for one in a few years.
As for 170 horsepower being weak...the thing is a 2 seater, it can't weigh too much, so there's gotta be a decent power to weight ratio. Also I recall hearing plans for a s/c version, should make things interesting ![]()
__________________
Mods: 15" hubcaps, cold Wisconsin air, brand new FRAM air filter, newly flushed radiator |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
http://www.fast-autos.net/pontiac/pontiacsolstice.html
that'll answer some of your questions. i think its ugly. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hi.
![]() |
its gotta be at least a mid 14s car, its gotta weight in the 25-3000 range, manual, with a 2.4 sc... it'll whomp cavaliers that run low 15's n/a...
rwd is nice too, i'd like to see some body kits for it - i'd seriously consider getting one
__________________
4cyl ga se -> 431whp srt4 -> 600whp s14? wtf. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hey paisanos!
![]() |
Nice lines. Interior looks good. We all know we won't see that same quality interior in the production car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
misunderstood
![]() AKA: Jason
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Peyton, CO
Posts: 1,244
Vehicle: 2000 GT Coupe
![]() |
If I had the money and a 2-seater was in my list of options in life......... I'd absolutely take one.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Free Member
![]() AKA: N/A
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 750
Vehicle: N/A
![]() |
car looks great, no plans of getting one...but it's hot
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Scrap scrap!
![]() |
Quote:
very true. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|