![]() |
|
|
#21 |
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
Why wouldn't you want DOD on a Vette? If I'm not driving the car at ~90% of it's limits I wouldn't mind some extra fuel economy. The DOD system doesn't add too much extra weight or complexity to pushrod engines.
Anyway, the extra HP boost is nice and builds some excitement for the car before the Blue Devil comes out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
^Because I've heard a lot of people say you can noticably feel it when it turns on and off, and no one would want that on a high end sports car. Maybe if they could smooth it out and make it less noticable? Like only activating/deactivating two cylinders at a time instead of all four at once... who knows.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Mmmm Donuts.
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
"Never argue with idiots. They bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Honda CRF 450
![]() |
The 300c isnt noticable at all, except for a light that comes on I beleive.
__________________
"We've got lots of letters from Windows users that say iTunes is their favorite program. Its like giving a glass of water to someone in hell" - Steve Jobs |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Schwartz Power!
![]() AKA: Andy
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ranson, WV
Age: 46
Posts: 2,027
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
2000 Grand Am GT (some day it will be SC/T) Mods: alot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
15.195 @ 89.82
![]() AKA: Zach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rockton, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 786
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT
![]() |
Me. Seriously, you wont be driving the car balls out all the time so why not spend the fuel wisely? My Dad's hemi Magnum has DoD and you don't notice going to 4 to 8 to 4 cylinders at all. I would think that with all the hype about fuel economy GM would put the DoD system in all their engines that are getting <20MPG to boost up those averages..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Wiley 'Ol Veteran
![]() AKA: Bob (aka Hoss)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Azerbaijan
Age: 45
Posts: 6,935
Vehicle: See My Signature Block
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
2016 GoMango Challenger SRT Hellcat 2014 Redline Pearl Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT 2018 Bruiser Grey Dodge Durango SRT TRADED-2004 Black Grand Am GT,2004 Impulse Blue GTO M6, 2012 Mineral Gray Jeep SRT8, 2010 Bright Silver Jeep SRT8 LEASE TURN-IN-2006 Summit White TrailBlazer SS AWD (Vector CAI & tune) SOLD-2000 Silvermist Grand Am GT Supercharged,1994 Daytona Blue Single Turbo RX7 (427whp/330wtq), 2006 Spice Red GTO A4, 2013 Grabber Blue Shelby GT500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
GAGT - Junkie
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
My Pics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
Quote:
About the rough transition, I've never driven a GM car with DOD, but I've been in Honda models with it (granted they are SOHC engines) and I couldn't notice it at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
'core' - master
![]() AKA: Cory
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Age: 41
Posts: 1,092
Vehicle: '04 Cavie, '04 Lancer
![]() |
I though the LS3 was the name of the 5.3 liter FWD v-8 seen in the W-bodies. They re-using the name?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() AKA: Josh
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 733
Vehicle: 09 Pontiac G8 GT
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: berwyn, il
Posts: 673
Vehicle: 2002 silver gt
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
2002 EARLY PRODUCTION........LAST OF THE GOOD ONES....WHEN THEMIRRORS WERE STILL PAINTED AND THE GRAND AM GT LOGOS WERE ON THE DOORS |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|