![]() |
|
|
#61 |
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
^ 300 HP definately works better when coming through the rear wheels when compared to the front. I think the point is that a 4.6L V8 should be putting out more than 300 this day in age.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Law Dawg
![]() AKA: Cody
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland Tx
Posts: 1,827
Vehicle: 2004 Grand Am SE1
![]() |
A cobalt, w/ 2.2L ecotec Turbo would be a bad little car. The power the engine is putting out in the Solstice GXP is pretty awesome. I would love to see that in a cobalt.
Edit: Oops I mispelled ecotec. I think I may have even mispelled it that time. Oh well you get the point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: berwyn, il
Posts: 673
Vehicle: 2002 silver gt
![]() |
Quote:
I think FORD is sitting on its laurels....having no competition and all. I already hear a 400 HP GT just in time for challenger and camaro. Kind of ironic on that timing of that.
__________________
2002 EARLY PRODUCTION........LAST OF THE GOOD ONES....WHEN THEMIRRORS WERE STILL PAINTED AND THE GRAND AM GT LOGOS WERE ON THE DOORS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
^ They're going to need it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: berwyn, il
Posts: 673
Vehicle: 2002 silver gt
![]() |
Oh yeah and prolly a bodystyle thats not 5 years old up against 2 new ones.
__________________
2002 EARLY PRODUCTION........LAST OF THE GOOD ONES....WHEN THEMIRRORS WERE STILL PAINTED AND THE GRAND AM GT LOGOS WERE ON THE DOORS |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Moderator
![]() AKA: Rich
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toledo, OH
Age: 36
Posts: 4,513
Vehicle: 2001 2.4 Grand Am
![]() |
word on the street is, its only going to be 280HP instead of 300:
http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-ca...to-280-hp.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Honda CRF 450
![]() |
Quote:
I see the HHR SS is a go and info is showing up in dealers. 3 Turbo's Cobalts have been spotted as well, I cant seem to find a pic.
__________________
"We've got lots of letters from Windows users that say iTunes is their favorite program. Its like giving a glass of water to someone in hell" - Steve Jobs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
BlingWithBallz
![]() AKA: Aaron
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit area, MI
Age: 43
Posts: 12,254
Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr
![]() ![]() |
It's got a lot of power.... it's still ugly and probably handles like crap. I liked the SRT4 better and remember how much trouble they had with that thing with torque steer and getting traction? This thing is gonna be un-drivable unless they make a 4wd version. 4wd turbo hatch ala rally style... now that would be hot! All they have to do is make it look cool now.
__________________
The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Moderator
![]() AKA: Rich
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toledo, OH
Age: 36
Posts: 4,513
Vehicle: 2001 2.4 Grand Am
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
car payment again :(
![]() |
Quote:
as for the Caliber...not bad...i would drive that over the Magnum.
__________________
??/??/???? - 11/07/2008: Goodbye 2001 Grand Am SE1...my first car, which i actually owned
Last edited by Grand_Damn; 07-29-2007 at 06:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: berwyn, il
Posts: 673
Vehicle: 2002 silver gt
![]() |
Funny how it took a "SUPERSNAKE" Mustang to finally get a cool looking hood on a Mustang.
__________________
2002 EARLY PRODUCTION........LAST OF THE GOOD ONES....WHEN THEMIRRORS WERE STILL PAINTED AND THE GRAND AM GT LOGOS WERE ON THE DOORS |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|