![]() |
|
|
#81 | |
|
Causes a ruckus
![]() AKA: Joe
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Detroit, MI
Age: 34
Posts: 5,011
Vehicle: Maligoat
![]() |
And also, I got this today:
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: N/A
Posts: 39
Vehicle: VT-II Executive
![]() |
Quote:
what i am saying is correct http://www.hsv.com.au/excelerate/10thanni/vt_coupe.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
I'll give my thoughts:
1: The GTO interior was great in 2003 but is now dated (I know, I'm driving an '05 at the moment). Recent GM products (think CTS, VUE, Lambda Crossovers, and Malibu) all have much nicer interiors with more features than the GTO ever dreamed of. 2: The G8 is not going to challenge people looking for an Acura TL, Infiniti G series, or any of the other luxury nameplates in the $30,00-$40,000 range. It will be a niche vehicle at most, but that is what the Pontiac division should be. Leave the everyday stuff and luxury vehicles to Chevy, Saturn and Cadillac. Pontiac will offer great performance at an affordable price. 3: The G8 is a much nicer vehicle (inside and out) than the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger, most likely it's biggest rivals. The Chrysler twins have crap interiors and sell well... 4: The vehicle is $1500 overpriced... |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
GAGT - Junkie
![]() AKA: Michael
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northglenn, CO USA
Age: 49
Posts: 3,394
Vehicle: 2015 Chrysler 200S AWD
![]() |
Quote:
...I wasn't being sarcastic... I like the car! The fact that i can rent one (it's a "whore"...) makes it more appealing! Someone called it a "rental whore" I was just pointing out that there are quite a few rental cars that are nice...
__________________
-Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
'core' - master
![]() AKA: Cory
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Age: 41
Posts: 1,092
Vehicle: '04 Cavie, '04 Lancer
![]() |
I've sat in a GTO and the interior is really nice, but at the same time I didn't like it because it wasn't very, well "pontiac". What I've seen of the G8's interior is awesome IMO, but this is coming from a guy who had to rent an Impala for a few days while his cavie was getting warrenty work, and was also very impressed with the Impala interior, in which many people would rip a new one because its not quite up to "honda" standards. But I drive a cavalier. It doesn't get any more crappy or basic than a cavalier's interior. I will say at least the cavalier's interior seems to hold together very well, but as for as styling tis as basic as it gets. Plain boring vents, no accents, Cloth seats with manual controls, and a very ugly whiteish - green back lighting color (really miss the cool red glow of the grand am's interior)so naturally when I see a G8 interior I'm very impressed.
But it really doesn't matter much as I probably will never own a G8. Don't really feel like spending $50/week to fuel one! |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Speed Racer
![]() AKA: Sean
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Somewhere
Age: 43
Posts: 1,440
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am GT Sedan
![]() |
__________________
2002 Pontiac Grand Am GT1 http://cardomain.com/id/ssgohan Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive. If it ain't broke, don't Microsoft it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | ||
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
Highlights from the article:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Causes a ruckus
![]() AKA: Joe
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Detroit, MI
Age: 34
Posts: 5,011
Vehicle: Maligoat
![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
FIGJAM
![]() AKA: Matt
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 9,675
Vehicle: Acura|Chevy|Porsche
![]() ![]() |
I just checked with my local dealer and they said mid-march for delivery.... you bet your ass I'm skipping work to test drive one of these.
__________________
'18 Acura MDX Kid hauler '15 Chevrolet Tahoe Toy Hauler '01 Porsche Boxster Project |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
UAW FTMFL
![]() |
Quote:
I do know that the company that I work for is replacing its entire line of Grand Prix's with G8's when they come out and plan on running the G8 as the replacement for the Grand Prix. I'm pretty sure the rest of the company will be doing that in other states too, so, as I see it, its going to be another GM with low residual values because of the rental car companies. Time will tell. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
anselv
![]() AKA: ansel
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: winnipeg , manitoba
Age: 37
Posts: 231
Vehicle: 2001 grand am se1
![]() |
looks like a great car . to bad it would not be available in canada.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
400 hp & 410 lb-ft
![]() AKA: Mike
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,671
Vehicle: '14 Camaro SS RS coupe
![]() |
Quote:
![]() http://gm.ca/gm/english/vehicles/pontiac/
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
anselv
![]() AKA: ansel
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: winnipeg , manitoba
Age: 37
Posts: 231
Vehicle: 2001 grand am se1
![]() |
I saw this car posted on the inadmissable list by transport canada , hopefully it changes :
http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/impor...S___SATURN.htm
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Speed Racer
![]() AKA: Sean
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Somewhere
Age: 43
Posts: 1,440
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am GT Sedan
![]() |
You canadians have some funny rules about imported cars...
![]()
__________________
2002 Pontiac Grand Am GT1 http://cardomain.com/id/ssgohan Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive. If it ain't broke, don't Microsoft it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
MiDnIgHt
![]() |
I don't get why some of these Vehicle's can't be Sold in Canada?
How do they Pick and Choose? I don't think there is much of any Differance between those sold here and sold in Canada. So why are some Not allowed?
__________________
Ashes to ashes, dust to dust, if it wasn't for FORD's our tools would rust! "Unions were the rise and will be the fall of this Great Nation" "A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in... And how many want out." Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you: 1. Jesus Christ 2. The American G. I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom. -Tony Blair |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
User account under probation
![]() AKA: GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 238
Vehicle: 2002
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
Canada has many different regulations than the US. Their safety, lighting, and emissions standards all differ slightly from the US models. If you notice, most of the vehicles not allowed in are fairly low volume cars that would not sell in numbers large enough to warrant redesigns to comply with Canada's standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
User account under probation
![]() AKA: GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 238
Vehicle: 2002
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Speed Racer
![]() AKA: Sean
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Somewhere
Age: 43
Posts: 1,440
Vehicle: 2002 Grand Am GT Sedan
![]() |
My favorite part:
The following vehicles, if equipped with power or manual seat back recliners for both driver and front seat passenger positions, are ADMISSIBLE for importation. If they are not so equipped then the seats must be replaced with a reclining seat at both front seat positions. Lazy canadians, you just don't want cars you can't take a nap in ![]()
__________________
2002 Pontiac Grand Am GT1 http://cardomain.com/id/ssgohan Don't take life too seriously, you'll never get out alive. If it ain't broke, don't Microsoft it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
SC and Loving It!
![]() |
^ Probably for rear impact crash standards. If you are hit hard enough from behind seats are designed to break and let you move backward to absorb the impact. Non-reclining seats are probably too rigid to break at the mandated impact speed.
|
|
|
|