REAL non-camo pics of a Black '09 Camaro - Page 2

Tonyyank · 03-11-2008, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stillriza

who the hell puts a hitch on a camaro? the rear end is discusting!

X2. love the front, back ruins the whole car

silvergtjrad · 03-11-2008, 04:56 PM

Honestly, I love the car. The hitch looks bad obviously, and I think the tail lights could be improved.

I dont care if it looks like a camaro. If its agressively styled, rwd, V8, and a coupe, then it works for me.

With some blacked out windows and a suspoension drop, IMO that thing would look near perfect.

notsoaveragej0e · 03-11-2008, 05:10 PM

Read the ENTIRE thread on camaro5 people... sheesh. Those are not the production headlights. The tail lights quite possibly are not either. The trailer hitch is explained in the thread too. The side vents may or may not be functional. Keep in mind this is still a very early production unit... the real deal isn't coming out until the end of 2009 for chrissake!

Reading comprehension FTL.

SikMindz · 03-11-2008, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notsoaveragej0e

Read the ENTIRE thread on camaro5 people... sheesh. Those are not the production headlights. The tail lights quite possibly are not either. The trailer hitch is explained in the thread too. The side vents may or may not be functional. Keep in mind this is still a very early production unit... the real deal isn't coming out until the end of 2009 for chrissake!

Reading comprehension FTL.

Fockin too much time on your hands FTL.

Who wants to read a Camaro forum when I have a PW thread to keep busy here?

If you were a Star Wars character, you would be Boba Fegg.

notsoaveragej0e · 03-11-2008, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SikMindz

Fockin too much time on your hands FTL.

Who wants to read a Camaro forum when I have a PW thread to keep busy here?

If you were a Star Wars character, you would be Boba Fegg.

I've given up trying to keep up with that thread, and instead just reply to whatever the last three posts are about. You'd be Jobba the ****, joo whore.

SSRacer · 03-11-2008, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SikMindz

But they're not even vents..they're like...ridges in the sheetmetal.

Just as they were in the 60's.

DomesticFreak · 03-11-2008, 07:32 PM

Front end needs the concept headlights, and the rear end just needs help.

And i agree, that the body lines do not flow well. Door indented, trunk lid sunk down.... Eh....

I'd drive it if it had some serious muscle.

But yeah, it's cool looking, but it needs some help.

AaronGTR · 03-11-2008, 07:43 PM

Eh, I honestly don't think it looks half as bad as Bob makes it out to be. Yes, it doesn't look as good as the concept... but WTF people? WHAT CAR EVER DOES?! There are certain things they can't do on a production car due to regulations or production costs, so you have to expect it.

The rear end looks a little bit narrow, but from the front it still looks wide and not that tall. Really the biggest problem I have with it is the headlights. Not liking them half as much as the single round light on the concept. Really though non of this is stuff the after market couldn't handle. Some different headlights, drop springs, and some rear fender flairs and you'd have one hot lookin' car!

bigbenSC · 03-11-2008, 07:48 PM

I like it a lot better in black than I did in white. I agree with most by saying that it is too tall. Even without all the production details worked out though, this car looks worlds better to me than the Challenger.

notsoaveragej0e · 03-11-2008, 07:50 PM

I guess I know why this smiley exists on their forum:

SikMindz · 03-11-2008, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SSRacer

Just as they were in the 60's.

Wasn't around then. Doesn't concern me.

DrFabulous · 03-11-2008, 08:16 PM

Body lines look pretty good. Sits too high, though.

I hope they try a different style on the headlights/tails

Rich · 03-11-2008, 10:11 PM

i dont think it looks THAT bad. i see what you guys are saying but still. would like to see the final production model as well.

PhantomLover007 · 03-12-2008, 12:10 AM

Seriously not impressed w/ any of the car pics. They all shatty to me. Sorry. JMO!

2003SCT · 03-12-2008, 12:39 AM

I am gonna have to withold judgement until later on this one....the black thing at the link sure looks like production level trim etc however it really is quite off from the nice looking concept. I would be amazed if GM really did bring something that messed up looking out after teasing everyone with the concept. They HAVE to bring out something worthy of the 7 year hiatus. If design wise that is all they would be able to muster(and I still doubt it is), then holy crap. Gm over the past couple years has gotten SO much better at taking concepts and really putting them on the street. If this new car pictured comes to be, backwards we go.

CHRIS

williamGT · 03-12-2008, 12:39 AM

I'm telling you, every year vehicles are getting ugly.....look at the G6....sorry if I hurt anyone here. thats my .02 cents

BlackAttackGA · 03-12-2008, 12:45 AM

Overall, I think the car looks pretty good. I agree that it should sit lower, and it looks way too bulky. I don't like this new boxy/bulky trend now (the Dodge Charger/Magnum, Chrysler 300C, Cadillacs in general, etc). What happened to the curves??? I mean, I know those are only a very select few, but I don't like these so-called performance cars looking like big boxes of crap.

2002GT · 03-12-2008, 05:07 AM

Looks good to me!

99GTCoupe · 03-12-2008, 10:08 AM

I'd like to see some better pics of it, but I'm iffy on it. I like it for the most part (and NOT because of the name, if could be called Dip-sh!t-whip for all I care), but some things like the headlights and ride height aren't right. They should have kept this:

You can tell it sits lower and just looks overall better

edit: And yes, that is a Transformers pic haha (well, as far as for promotional stuff I mean)

AMRAAM4 · 03-12-2008, 10:49 AM

^ I like the fake brake rotor they attached to the hub of the wheel so there wasn't so much space behind those 20" wheels, and you couldn't see the size of the real rotors.

03-11-2008, 04:56 PM	#22
silvergtjrad yargh! AKA: Jared Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Woodridge, IL Age: 34 Posts: 1,633 Vehicle: 06 TBSS	Honestly, I love the car. The hitch looks bad obviously, and I think the tail lights could be improved. I dont care if it looks like a camaro. If its agressively styled, rwd, V8, and a coupe, then it works for me. With some blacked out windows and a suspoension drop, IMO that thing would look near perfect. __________________ 2006 AWD TBSS 11.719

03-11-2008, 05:10 PM	#23
notsoaveragej0e Causes a ruckus AKA: Joe Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Detroit, MI Age: 34 Posts: 5,011 Vehicle: Maligoat	Read the ENTIRE thread on camaro5 people... sheesh. Those are not the production headlights. The tail lights quite possibly are not either. The trailer hitch is explained in the thread too. The side vents may or may not be functional. Keep in mind this is still a very early production unit... the real deal isn't coming out until the end of 2009 for chrissake! Reading comprehension FTL. __________________

03-11-2008, 07:32 PM	#27
DomesticFreak User Error AKA: Chris Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Troy, NY Age: 34 Posts: 382 Vehicle: 03 Cavi + 96 Ram 1500	Front end needs the concept headlights, and the rear end just needs help. And i agree, that the body lines do not flow well. Door indented, trunk lid sunk down.... Eh.... I'd drive it if it had some serious muscle. But yeah, it's cool looking, but it needs some help. __________________ DODGE the father, RAM the daughter...

03-11-2008, 07:43 PM	#28
AaronGTR BlingWithBallz AKA: Aaron Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Detroit area, MI Age: 43 Posts: 12,254 Vehicle: 2000 Grand Am GT1 2dr	Eh, I honestly don't think it looks half as bad as Bob makes it out to be. Yes, it doesn't look as good as the concept... but WTF people? WHAT CAR EVER DOES?! There are certain things they can't do on a production car due to regulations or production costs, so you have to expect it. The rear end looks a little bit narrow, but from the front it still looks wide and not that tall. Really the biggest problem I have with it is the headlights. Not liking them half as much as the single round light on the concept. Really though non of this is stuff the after market couldn't handle. Some different headlights, drop springs, and some rear fender flairs and you'd have one hot lookin' car! __________________ The few, the proud, the boosted! 13.788 @ 103.73 mph (3/2011) 320 whp and 300 ft/lbs torque. (3/2011) See it here. the total package.

03-11-2008, 07:50 PM	#30
notsoaveragej0e Causes a ruckus AKA: Joe Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Detroit, MI Age: 34 Posts: 5,011 Vehicle: Maligoat	I guess I know why this smiley exists on their forum: __________________

03-11-2008, 07:48 PM	#29
bigbenSC SC and Loving It! AKA: Ben Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, KY Age: 36 Posts: 1,772 Vehicle: 2005 SRT-6, 2001 GA GT	I like it a lot better in black than I did in white. I agree with most by saying that it is too tall. Even without all the production details worked out though, this car looks worlds better to me than the Challenger.

03-11-2008, 08:16 PM	#32
DrFabulous FIGJAM AKA: Matt Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MN Posts: 9,675 Vehicle: Acura\|Chevy\|Porsche	Body lines look pretty good. Sits too high, though. I hope they try a different style on the headlights/tails __________________ '18 Acura MDX Kid hauler '15 Chevrolet Tahoe Toy Hauler '01 Porsche Boxster Project

03-11-2008, 10:11 PM	#33
Rich Moderator AKA: Rich Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Toledo, OH Age: 36 Posts: 4,513 Vehicle: 2001 2.4 Grand Am	i dont think it looks THAT bad. i see what you guys are saying but still. would like to see the final production model as well. __________________ "The news isn't so depressing when you're surrounded by bubbles." fquick

03-12-2008, 12:39 AM	#35
2003SCT GAGT - Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, NV Age: 41 Posts: 1,710 Vehicle: 2003 Grand Am SC/T	I am gonna have to withold judgement until later on this one....the black thing at the link sure looks like production level trim etc however it really is quite off from the nice looking concept. I would be amazed if GM really did bring something that messed up looking out after teasing everyone with the concept. They HAVE to bring out something worthy of the 7 year hiatus. If design wise that is all they would be able to muster(and I still doubt it is), then holy crap. Gm over the past couple years has gotten SO much better at taking concepts and really putting them on the street. If this new car pictured comes to be, backwards we go. CHRIS __________________ UNLV Alumni...Go Rebels! 2003 Grand Am SC/T Coupe in White. Borla Cat-Back, F/R Speedbuilt sway bars, H&R Sports/KYB, 18" Misano Lightweights wrapped in Falken FK-452 Euro-Sports and ZAINO! 2000 Chevrolet S10 Flareside: K&N Intake, Truxedo Tonneau and Gibson Cat Back

03-12-2008, 12:39 AM	#36
williamGT 09 G8 GT AKA: william Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: yellowknife Age: 37 Posts: 1,390 Vehicle: 2009 Pontiac G8 GT	I'm telling you, every year vehicles are getting ugly.....look at the G6....sorry if I hurt anyone here. thats my .02 cents __________________ 2009 Pontiac G8 GT, Panther black. Mods: Doug Thorley shorties, Solo mach unbalance cat-back, catless, Roto-Fab intake, HP tuned and atari style center gauge

03-12-2008, 12:45 AM	#37
BlackAttackGA Proud GA Owner AKA: Miles Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Twinsburg, OH Posts: 469 Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am SE Sedan	Overall, I think the car looks pretty good. I agree that it should sit lower, and it looks way too bulky. I don't like this new boxy/bulky trend now (the Dodge Charger/Magnum, Chrysler 300C, Cadillacs in general, etc). What happened to the curves??? I mean, I know those are only a very select few, but I don't like these so-called performance cars looking like big boxes of crap. __________________ THE Ohio State University "Time and change will surely show, How firm thy friendship...OHIO!"

03-12-2008, 05:07 AM	#38
2002GT GAGT - Junkie AKA: Nick Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Southeast Posts: 3,817 Vehicle: Charger 392	Looks good to me!

03-12-2008, 10:08 AM	#39
99GTCoupe Teh Pwn AKA: Patrick Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West Bloomfield, MI Age: 38 Posts: 750 Vehicle: 1999 Grand Am GT Coupe	I'd like to see some better pics of it, but I'm iffy on it. I like it for the most part (and NOT because of the name, if could be called Dip-sh!t-whip for all I care), but some things like the headlights and ride height aren't right. They should have kept this: You can tell it sits lower and just looks overall better edit: And yes, that is a Transformers pic haha (well, as far as for promotional stuff I mean) __________________ View Gabrielle here And here

03-12-2008, 10:49 AM	#40
AMRAAM4 Wiley 'Ol Veteran AKA: Bob (aka Hoss) Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Azerbaijan Age: 45 Posts: 6,935 Vehicle: See My Signature Block	^ I like the fake brake rotor they attached to the hub of the wheel so there wasn't so much space behind those 20" wheels, and you couldn't see the size of the real rotors. __________________ 2016 GoMango Challenger SRT Hellcat 2014 Redline Pearl Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT 2018 Bruiser Grey Dodge Durango SRT TRADED-2004 Black Grand Am GT,2004 Impulse Blue GTO M6, 2012 Mineral Gray Jeep SRT8, 2010 Bright Silver Jeep SRT8 LEASE TURN-IN-2006 Summit White TrailBlazer SS AWD (Vector CAI & tune) SOLD-2000 Silvermist Grand Am GT Supercharged,1994 Daytona Blue Single Turbo RX7 (427whp/330wtq), 2006 Spice Red GTO A4, 2013 Grabber Blue Shelby GT500

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode