![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mp3 Enabled
![]() |
My Day at the track...(jet chip tested)
I went to the track today in fear that it would close soon, but then learned when I got there that I have all the way until the end of DEC, so I was pretty happy about that.
My times didn't come out as good as I had hoped. I DEFINITELY thought I was going to hit 15.2 - 15.3 with my mods but had these results: Run 1: 15.781 @ 86.784 mph, Reaction .874 JET CHIP OFF! Run 2: 15.756 @ 86.746 mph, Reaction .599 JET CHIP ON! Run3: 15.756 @ 87.675 mph, Reaction .107 JET CHIP ON! Now as you can see my launching was getting better and better as I was getting used to it, but by the 3rd run where my launch was almost perfect, my 1/4 did not even improve, but my top speed was faster. This doesn't quite make sense to me, can anyone make sense of it for me? All runs were done at sea level, with my subs taken out, and on less than a 1/4 of a tank of gas. Now what I was really disappointed is that the jet chip made absolutely no difference in my quarter mile, I think its safe to say that my quarter mile improved the second run because my reaction was much better. Im ready to just rip that thing out of there. With a CAI, Flowmaster Exhaust, Thermostat and Jet Chip I figured id break 15.3s, but in the very cold dry air today came up short. Let me have your comments please. Make some sense of this! Last edited by Cliff; 11-03-2002 at 10:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Grease Monkey
![]() Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: drexel hill
Age: 44
Posts: 659
Vehicle: 99GAGTBLACKmodded!
![]() |
Quote:
Don't feel bad I got a 15.5 with a reaction of .571 I dialed in at 15.2 thinking I would be close but was the first time I ran. I know I was spinning way too much tire out of the hole but are YOU shore you where launching good and warming the tires enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() |
Yeah R/T doesn't have any effect on your overall time. If you want to see how your launch affected your times, look at the 60 foot times on your slips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
User account under probation
![]() |
Quote:
Kinda how I felt after I raced my car for the first time after the new cam install and was slower than previous times.... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Mp3 Enabled
![]() |
Yeah my tire spin was minimal, but I really didn't warm the tires too much before staging either. Quick spin then up to the line I went.
Anyway here is my reaction vs 60 ft, which doesn't seem to make sense to me either: Reaction .874/60 FT 2.387 Reaction .599/60 FT 2.353 Reaction .107/60 FT 2.386 My 3rd run had the best reaction time, yet had a worse 60 ft then my first run, figure that one. Do you think I should have warmed my tires more? How about my launch? I power breaked her up to about 2500, i've heard people say as much as 3500, whats the best rpm limit? Oh and I went to Long Island Motorsports Park....www.limotorsportspark.com Last edited by Cliff; 11-04-2002 at 09:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
N-Body.net Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
GAGT - Senior Member
![]() |
I found that the JET really helped me, the more work I did the better it made that car perform. I went from a 15.5 with it and just an intake and exhaust, to a 15.26 with the TB and a CAI.
My throttle response was really enhanced with the JET. You could feel the difference with it on... My .02 JOUT |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Mp3 Enabled
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
GA 2 GTP
![]() |
I ran once with my pcu off and i noticed 1-2 tenths differce.
Your 60' seem alittle slow. Mine are .3 faster. Maybe if u worked on that you would hit your 15.3.. i dont know just an idea..
__________________
1997 XPZed GTP 12.30@111.9 with 1.70 60' Clubgp.com zzperformance.com migpc.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
wanna race?
![]() Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: philadelphia
Age: 43
Posts: 55
Vehicle: 2002 se-r spec V
![]() |
I think you mean 1.000 not .100 anyway get those sixties down and you will be alright!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Mp3 Enabled
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() |
put some drag radials on!
![]()
__________________
N-Body.net Profile |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Mp3 Enabled
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
GA 2 GTP
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
1997 XPZed GTP 12.30@111.9 with 1.70 60' Clubgp.com zzperformance.com migpc.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Mp3 Enabled
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
User account under probation
![]() |
A .104 launch isn't good if you are trying to win a race.... because you just lost. Any reaction time less than 0.500 means a red light which means you just forfeited the race. If you aren't racing, don't care about the lights, etc... then sure its a good launch. But so is a 10 sec. RT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Mp3 Enabled
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
GAGT - Member
![]() |
Doesn't it take a while for the car to adjust for the Jet Chip? I know with stuff like Intake, Exhaust and such the car needs to "warm it self up to it". I though the same were with chips. But im probably wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ok here is my .01....the Jet is a waste..plain and simple. I have found that I ran quicker times by not power breaking...I just keep it at idle and punch it at the light...I dropped 2 tenths by doing that...my car was getting quicker at each run, but I ran out of time so I didn't get to drop it any further.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|