GrandAmGT.com Forum
http://www.pfyc.com GrandAmGT.com Premium Memership Signup
RotorsOnline.com   

Go Back   GrandAmGT.com Forum > GAGT - Main - Sponsored by www.PFYC.com > Newbies & FAQs > Help Me Decide

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2008, 07:01 PM   #1
Mike Jung
400 hp & 410 lb-ft
 
Mike Jung's Avatar
 
AKA: Mike
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,670
Vehicle: '14 Camaro SS RS coupe
Mike Jung a trusted member
Question Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS L lens

Help someone decide, that PM'd me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Expert opinion sought on a lens

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I remember that you worked at a camera rental shop and you knew of good lenses to get. I have my eye on a Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens. The ratings on Amazon are pretty good and the lens is going for about $1300. Do you have any opinions on the lens and/or price? Let me know.

Thanks
Ok, here is my thought on this lens...

We do carry this lens at work for rental.
& I do not openly suggest this lens, unless they have a specific need.

I would only suggest this lens if you will be shooting outdoors during daylight hours.
& need the 400mm magnificant.
& it has to be hand holdable.
As it is effectively 400mm at f/5.6; which is the bare minimum that autofocus lens could function.
& autofocus could be slow, or not able to autofocus in lower light levels.
& I don't like the pull/push zoom design.

I would strongly suggest that you rent the lens.
So you can try it out before buying.
See: PDN - Photo Source listings of rental shops in IL

Example: Calumet has it for rental for $35/day.

If you are going to spend that kind of money...$1410 for a Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS L lens.

I would get instead the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 IS L lens at $1699.
This lens is what the pro's will use more often.
& we rent this lens more often too.
We have like more than 1/2 dozen of these lenses in our rental stock; but only 2 of the 100-400mm lens.

Or check out what Seth got in: Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 IS lens vs Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L lens
A Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 lens for the smaller CMOS sensor (meaning not full frame sensor like the Canon EOS 5D, 1Ds, 1Ds Mark II, 1Ds Mark III)
PS: Sigma has a newer version Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM lens at $799 now.
But note: I do not have 1st hand knowledge on Sigma lens; as our shop does not carry them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by kse73 View Post
If knowledge was power, Mike Jung would be Stalin
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
you ****in scare me sometimes, jung
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramair4thesoul View Post
..." hey MJ want to have hot, sweaty, passionate sex. I'll let you do things to me you just dream about now. Oh, I give porn head and my boobs are amazing." ...

Last edited by Mike Jung; 03-06-2008 at 07:10 PM.
Mike Jung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2008, 07:10 PM   #2
iceman
woop woop
 
iceman's Avatar
 
AKA: Seth
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Age: 37
Posts: 10,525
Vehicle: 97 Blazer - 84 Fiero
iceman has disabled reputation
Send a message via AIM to iceman Send a message via Yahoo to iceman
I too would pick the Canon 70-200 IS USM f/2.8L over the 100-400 4.5-5.6. Aperture is not wide enough.

I ended up going with the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8, do not regret the choice one bit. I could not justify the price difference for the Canon L, and really could not justify the price difference for the Canon IS. I am extremely happy with the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8.

Talked to a guy at B&H when I was there on Sunday who was playing with the 600mm on a 5D body and he did not have many good things to say about the 100-400 (asked him what other telephotos he had tried)
iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:00 AM   #3
lone_wolf025
Spirit guides
 
lone_wolf025's Avatar
 
AKA: Jon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 34
Posts: 3,139
Vehicle: 2003 Grand Am GT1
lone_wolf025 Gettin' there
Send a message via AIM to lone_wolf025
I'm the mystery guy. I was browsing Canon's catalog and the 100-400 caught my eye. Specifically because it is a zoom lens. My thoughts are using it for such things as trips to the zoo, or other such outdoor nature shots. Figure most subjects would be anywhere from 10-30ft away. I've heard that if you're looking for that large zoom than the fixed 400mm is a much better choice. But I like the input. Lets hear some more.
__________________
A lack of something better

Never ask why people do strange/stupid things...the answer just makes it worse...

14.841 @91.56mph


Quote:
Originally Posted by Someone else
Ahhh but that would be in the land of "Makes Sense"...you forget that we live in the land of "DUHHH"
lone_wolf025 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 12:38 AM   #4
iceman
woop woop
 
iceman's Avatar
 
AKA: Seth
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Age: 37
Posts: 10,525
Vehicle: 97 Blazer - 84 Fiero
iceman has disabled reputation
Send a message via AIM to iceman Send a message via Yahoo to iceman
10-30 feet away? 400mm is overkill then IMO

Here's some sample pics
First, here's a wide angle @ 17mm to show you where I was in relation to the players



at 200mm w/ the sigma

iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 07:03 AM   #5
lone_wolf025
Spirit guides
 
lone_wolf025's Avatar
 
AKA: Jon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 34
Posts: 3,139
Vehicle: 2003 Grand Am GT1
lone_wolf025 Gettin' there
Send a message via AIM to lone_wolf025
Hmmm I think you're right. 400 would put you with the outfielders then. If that's 200 I think it'd be more than enough.
__________________
A lack of something better

Never ask why people do strange/stupid things...the answer just makes it worse...

14.841 @91.56mph


Quote:
Originally Posted by Someone else
Ahhh but that would be in the land of "Makes Sense"...you forget that we live in the land of "DUHHH"
lone_wolf025 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 07:04 AM   #6
iceman
woop woop
 
iceman's Avatar
 
AKA: Seth
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Age: 37
Posts: 10,525
Vehicle: 97 Blazer - 84 Fiero
iceman has disabled reputation
Send a message via AIM to iceman Send a message via Yahoo to iceman
I have a 1.6x tele converter as well that turns the lens into a 98-290 f/4.0. the images are not as sharp but still good.

If you got the cash, 70-200 IS USM f/2.8L is the way to go. For half the price you can have the sigma 70-200 HSM f/2.8 , no IS, but I haven't found that I need it in the year or so that I've had the lens
iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2011 GrandAmGT.com
RotorsOnline.com